RHP

RHP User

M40

Anal sex and STIs

December 11 2013

Don't freak out. I'm asking for some knowledge, as I'm yet try it out (not on me, never on me). So I got bored and started doing some research, one thing is abundantly clear. The risk of transmission is greater. However (and this is where I want your knowledge) does the person receiving have to have an STI for the the person penetrating to contract an STI? I'm thinking the answer would be along the lines of "no STI means risk of transmission" I thought this a reasonable question given the amount of bugs... That live in the area (and yes I'm aware saliva is worse than fecal matter). I'm yet find an answer to this question.

Comments

  • Mischeviouslad

    Mischeviouslad

    11 years ago

    So..... Hopefully someone offers information that satisfies your question. But..... my question to you is.... Would it make a difference? Really??? I assume you practice safe sex.... thereby minimizing or at worst limiting the likelihood of any STI through back door hokey pokey. So if the information given suggests the risks are too high for you, ..... if Little Miss (or mister, dunno what way you swing) Curvybutt offers themselves up to you.... are you gonna say "no thanks, I read on RHP that its not s good idea"? DG - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Yes mischievouslad, I practice safe sex. To answer your question,Probably not, I'd just be more Careful. Lastly, for the record... I'm straight. Cheers for the reply

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    You said: " However (and this is where I want your knowledge) does the person receiving have to have an STI for the the person penetrating to contract an STI?" The answer to what you said would have to be that you can catch STD/STI giving or receiving. Well at least that is what was preached to us through school in sex ed and by other medical professionals at varying times in my life. You will never know if someone else has an STD unless you babysit them at the clinic when they have a sex health check and tests and then stand by thier side for three months making sure they have no sex with any other people till they get another test for HIV and another lot of blood tests, stay by thier side making sure they have no sex with anyone till the negative result report comes back from the clinic on the second round of tests. You can have a sex health check, get a negative result and then go have sex that night and catch something that night that might not appear as a possitive on a test for a few months such as HIV. Seriously have to worry about those people out thier that think or assume someone is clean and that they can't catch anything if they are the giver.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    According to the interwebs:- Unprotected anal sex is riskier than unprotected vaginal sex because the lining of the anus is thinner and more susceptible to tears than the vagina. T- tears and anal abscesses that can result from tears can make STI and HIV transmission easier, regardless of giving or receiving. - Best advice is to use lots of lube, be gentle, wear a condom and stop if it hurts a lot.

  • DynamicCouple36

    DynamicCouple36

    11 years ago

    The STI's are passed both ways . Both the giver and receiver can catch them . That said the receiver is more at risk due to the fragile nature of the lining/membrane of the anus / rectum , which easily tears and gets damaged, allowing a pathway for infections / diseases to get into the bloodstream. Even rimming is risky. One also has to be very VERY careful not to cross contaminate the vagina with ecoli - a sure way to get a UTI.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Perhaps a poorly worded question. But thankyou for the reply. I was thinking more along the lines of catching/contracting something due to the existing (natural) bacteria in ones colon. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    If either the giver or the receiver have an STI it can be passed on in any sexual act that involves penetration. The chances of transmission depends on the method. Anal sex increases the chance of some infections as there is less lubrication and therefore more chance of blood to blood transfer. I suggest you should reseach either and stop

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    If either the giver or the receiver have an STI it can be passed on in any sexual act that involves penetration. The chances of transmission depends on the method. Anal sex increases the chance of some infections as there is less lubrication and therefore more chance of blood to blood transfer. I suggest you should reseach either and stop

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I think penetration has a role in such transfers, by increasing the risk, via blood/secretion transfers... But penetration is not the only method of transfer... But your question actually asks if neither party has an STI, will a STI be created... Err, answer... NO. Unless you have a typo... And I don't understand your question...two healthy people cannot create a nasty infection by pleasing each other sexually. hp xo 💌 In Melbourne for Xmas... wingman and playmate required... Sorry sold out...😎

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    matter what everyone says or believes, condoms or not. the more interaction we have with different people the higher is the risk. Even Kissing...just think about Glendular fever, its nasty and takes a long time to recover from....my oldest son suffered for three years, nasty stuff.It was a Uni Present and freedom. So when anybody believe we are safe think again, the more interaction with people the more chance of contracting SOMETHING.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    There is an increased risk with some infections, HIV being the big one. I am sure google is your friend with this question. Always use protection!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    You don't even need to be the one having sex to contract something.... - Posted from rhpmobile