Interesting, funny and appalling experiment on online dating.

January 06 2014

I don't known if linking externally is allowed, so just google search "cracked okcupid", and the article title is "4 things I learned from the worst online dating profile ever". In a nutshell the author set out to create a fake profile on OkCupid. This fake woman is the most vile person you can imagine; racist, stupid, shallow, trashy and gold digging among a few adjectives you might use to describe. Her favourite things are to pretend she's pregnant to win child support, and pretending she's at law school so her parents will fund her partying addiction. *Oh, but she is hot. Watch the messages roll in in the hundreds, and watch her vain attempts to dissuade men with horrific responses (that honestly make my balls shrivel up and want to go inside just reading them). My opinion about people who don't message back has shifted. Why the hell would you respond, if all it's going to do is encourage them? - Posted from rhpmobile

Comments

  • Mischeviouslad

    Mischeviouslad

    11 years ago

    Flip the script..... imagine some of the vile messages real profiles receive.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    being thrown around SWB!!! PMSL I think she actually sounds like a lot of Gen Y princesses you see on TV, so nothing shocking there!

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    there are a gazillion men like those that messaged her on here ...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Huh? Haven't you been reading the forums? The article brings no surprises to me, I would say that is just normal. At least none of the emails she presented were overtly sexually. My most recent first message from a man in his 30's "Im keen would love to eat that big butt of urs" Have a look at my begging thread, you are going to love that. Hehe.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    The way of stopping the messages is to say you are looking for the love of your life as the last love of your life has taken out an avo against you. So lover, what is your favourite wedding fantasy? Lol

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Men ignore their instincts. Women don't. :) - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I want to reply to everyone, but even my polite declines sometimes just egg guys on or they want to argue with me about why I'm wrong about them or why I'm here if I'm rejecting reasonable guys anyway?? Assholes that don't want to take no for an answer, so I am less concerned about replying now. Damned if you do, damned if you don't, can't please everyone, same old story.

  • blond_gypsy

    blond_gypsy

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Meeka100' The way of stopping the messages is to say you are looking for the love of your life as the last love of your life has taken out an avo against you. So lover, what is your favourite wedding fantasy? Lol The minute she started talking about faking pregnancies for child support would have had me running for cover. Actually no, the entire profile would have made it impossible to click "back" fast enough.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    "Im Aaron Carters biggest fan and if u cant handle that then get out of my face!! YOLO""sooooo glad their making another Grown Ups movie, the first was the shit lol!" "She got 150 messages in 24 hours" Thank you for sharing this. It was some of the funniest shit I've read in a while. Definitely trying this on April fools.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    To quote Paint_me "I think she actually sounds like a lot of Gen Y princesses you see on TV, so nothing shocking there!" Even though the profile was a fake and set up as bait, it is representative of many of the real dating profiles put up by women. There was a website (gone now or was it taken down) that collected hundreds of women's profiles from dating sites to illustrate the amount of "fail" that is out there with contemporary entitled women. It covered all ages not just Gen Y. The amusing read on that site was the dissection of the profiles and then rewritten to show what the women really meant or were attempting to obfuscate about themselves and their real intent. Many were profiles from former "Carousel Riders" who spent their misguided youth (and beauty) chasing Alphas and being "Pumped & Dumped", then realizing through their hard party lifestyle and fading looks they had better find a "Beta chump" with a wallet before they were left on the shelf. More collateral damage (damaged women) from the failed feminist experiment that spread the message widely that women could have it all, do what they like and suffer no consequences or be held accountable. Looking through the replies in the "fake" profile it looks like the "trolls" were drawn out of their caves as were the "simps", "pussy beggers", "manginas" and last but not least the "Captain Save Ho" white knights all hoping to curry favour and get some "pussy" crumbs thrown their way. The true state of affairs is Alpha lays and Beta pays. Tough luck for a guy that is not viewed by women as "hawwt" or possesses an encyclopedic knowledge of PUA (Pick Up Artist) skills that will charm the panties off women. I'm quickly heading for the safety of my trench before the incoming arrives. Who is John Galt?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I am obviously far to old... Who is Aaron Carter and what does YOLO mean again?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I'm happy to say my experience with the Mr. on RHP has not been at all representtive of this thread or what I read in here so often. We would send in reply a simple thank you, but you're not who I/we're am looking for and at least 10% messaged back simply to say thanks for replying. Only one nasty idiot, and a couple of deliberate idiots in our years on here.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Was one of the village people. And YOLO is a Swedish dessert :) - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Meeka100' I am obviously far to old... Who is Aaron Carter and what does YOLO mean again? To Quote from Wikipedia Aaron Charles Carter is an American singer. He came to fame as a pop and hip hop singer in the late 1990s, establishing himself as a star among pre-teen and teenage audiences during the early-first decade of the 21st century. YOLO means "You Only Live Once". See Wikipedia and other sources for a good explanation.

  • Mr_MrsAraps

    Mr_MrsAraps

    11 years ago

    Funny as but unfortunately so so true. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Very funny Arten, especially your description of women. Touché.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Meeka100' The way of stopping the messages is to say you are looking for the love of your life as the last love of your life has taken out an avo against you. So lover, what is your favourite wedding fantasy? Lol

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    More collateral damage (damaged women) from the failed feminist experiment that spread the message widely that women could have it all, do what they like and suffer no consequences or be held accountable. Your argument is typical feminist backlash bullshit! Most feminists don't need some bloke to bank roll them, and the ones who choose to be stay at home mums, well, they got the sperm from somewhere to procreate. Good idea running for the bunker cos it seems to me you've been in there wanking for so long its addled your brain and made you a narrow minded idiot! And Meeka, women don't need to be bagged out by other women. Sure there are some women wjo behave like arse-holes but we don't know their stories so how can we judge??

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Your post inspired me to google 'fail dating profile'.Thank you. I haven't laughed so hard in ages. I nearly peed my pants.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    at 101 years,I guess it doesn't matter what antediluvian comments you make because no card carrying feminist would touch your pole with a barge...well not unless you are J.Howard Marshall.

  • Paradisepair

    Paradisepair

    11 years ago

    It's really quite wrong, but terribly funny.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Well my first reaction was similar to yours, and then I decided that Artmen is trolling for a response and I decided I wasn't going to fall for it. If we all stop feeding the trolls maybe they will go away?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    It isn't be first time that he has made his "controversial" comment to only say he is going to duck for cover.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'paint_me' Your post inspired me to google 'fail dating profile'.Thank you. I haven't laughed so hard in ages. I nearly peed my pants. Nice to bring a smile to your face. It's a pity the site I spoke about has gone because there were some priceless ones on offer there that would have had you damaging your ribs. Funny as they were especially the dissected re-writes (of what they really meant) many were sad as to the level of delusion that ran through them.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    MeekaIt actually means telling someone their behaviour is inappropriate. By remaining silent or laughing with them we are complicit in their abuse of women, whether it be emotional, verbal or physical. Just call me the nanny goat gruff . . . .

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Meeka100' Well my first reaction was similar to yours, and then I decided that Artmen is trolling for a response and I decided I wasn't going to fall for it. If we all stop feeding the trolls maybe they will go away? To quote Wikipedia "In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally[3][4] or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[5] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. " I'm NOT a Troll and my intent was not to inflame or disrupt the topic but to throw a spotlight on what is slowly unfolding in the dynamic between men and women broadly speaking. What the OP was illustrating with the "fake" profile is a close facsimile of the true state of affairs especially so in the female age demographic below yours.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'WildSong' More collateral damage (damaged women) from the failed feminist experiment that spread the message widely that women could have it all, do what they like and suffer no consequences or be held accountable. Your argument is typical feminist backlash bullshit! Most feminists don't need some bloke to bank roll them, and the ones who choose to be stay at home mums, well, they got the sperm from somewhere to procreate. Good idea running for the bunker cos it seems to me you've been in there wanking for so long its addled your brain and made you a narrow minded idiot! And Meeka, women don't need to be bagged out by other women. Sure there are some women wjo behave like arse-holes but we don't know their stories so how can we judge?? ============================================================= Mmmmm, looks like the messenger has been well and truly bullet ridden. LOL It also appears that a fellow sister has also received a "spanking" for not supporting the sisterhood. I detect a “Straw Man” retort and an attempt at using shaming language to silence me which is a stock standard weapon in the feminist’s armoury. I could debate you however if your solipsism runs deep then logic will fall upon deaf ears. Rather than me regurgitate in summary form the disservice that the more radical form of feminism has done in stripping away the social constraints on female innate hypergamy and how contemporary women relate to men, then I invite you to read through the thousands of words written on this subject at the following web sites. You may choose to reject reality (the truth) and substitute your own and not peruse any of them, however others read this post and may wish to find out more especially so our younger male readers many of whom may be perplexed by female behaviour. This can’t be more clear on the how and why they (women) controls men’s access to sex. Because the RHP moderators probably don’t allow external website links you can locate the websites by using Google Search. “The Rational Male” “Heartiste” “Sunshine Mary” Wife and mother against feminism. “Grerp” The Lost Art of Self Preservation (for Women) There are also a multitude of websites addressing the same issues, many if you are interested in are linked from the aforementioned websites. To address your egregious comment "Your argument is typical feminist backlash bullshit!" If feminism is the bees knees then why would there be a backlash including from women? Feminism (in it's current incarnation) is NOT about equality but about power.

  • lovman8

    lovman8

    11 years ago

    Careful Paintme, "peeing your pants laughing' could prompt a whole heap of dubious responses......... which you will then post on line........... and it will cause a whole lot of people to laugh nearly peeing there pants........... and rhp will implode

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    This sort of indicates a sense of realisation that it's loaded.... And let's be honest .... That's my job damnit!!!! :p - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I would disagree with your take on feminism. The today's version of feminism has been a mutation of the original intention, brought about by the "extremist" element that exists in every group of people. It WAS about equality, and it still has a long way to go, as we still currently see men being paid more to do the same job. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • madotara69

    madotara69

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'lovman8' Careful Paintme, "peeing your pants laughing' could prompt a whole heap of dubious responses......... which you will then post on line........... and it will cause a whole lot of people to laugh nearly peeing there pants........... and rhp will implode Think it is called the butterfly effect. Meaning it could quite passably make it to the local paper. Mado Tara xx

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I just checked out their facebook and tumblr pages. And the reasons posted by men and women about why they need frminism are some really basic stuff, with not a whisper of taking over the world. . I need feminism because... . ... nowhere in the world should it be an act of bravery for a girl to go to school. . ... my sexy dress is not an invitation. . ... society teaches us, "DON'T GET RAPED", rather than, "DON'T RAPE" . ... how else will I ever find an equal partner who can push me to grow? . ... when I talked to a male friend about the issue he called me a man hater and told me I was a fanatic and refused to talk to me ever again. Just because I am scared when I’m out at night. . ... I shouldn’t be ashamed of my choices to be intimate with someone I care about. Because my first boyfriend joked that I am a slut. When he was my first. I need feminism because his words affect me to this day. . ... I need feminism because women should not say “all men are the same”. Society is making men look like sex-driven monsters when there are men who believe in equal rights. . I liked your last post Stirrer :-)

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    If a male feels emasculated by a woman being his equal, then clearly he's relied on the repression of women as a means to succeed. And that's hardly manly.....that's thuggery. - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Arten' I could debate you however if your solipsism runs deep then logic will fall upon deaf ears. Rather than me regurgitate in summary form the disservice that the more radical form of feminism has done in stripping away the social constraints on female innate hypergamy and how contemporary women relate to men, then I invite you to read through the thousands of words written on this subject at the following web sites. You may choose to reject reality (the truth) and substitute your own and not peruse any of them, however others read this post and may wish to find out more especially so our younger male readers many of whom may be perplexed by female behaviour. This can’t be more clear on the how and why they (women) controls men’s access to sex. Because the RHP moderators probably don’t allow external website links you can locate the websites by using Google Search. “The Rational Male” “Heartiste” “Sunshine Mary” Wife and mother against feminism. “Grerp” The Lost Art of Self Preservation (for Women) There are also a multitude of websites addressing the same issues, many if you are interested in are linked from the aforementioned websites. You do realise that the cherry-picked websites you've listed don't reveal any 'proof' or 'truth' about anything? They are just the opinions of people you happen to agree with. As they say - opinions are like arseholes - and the internet has facilitated the spread of all these opinions extremely well, no matter how illogical / irrational / based on crap they happen to be. Clearly you have a particular agenda based on your fear and ignorance of what true feminism actually is, so I would suggest that you read a bit more widely and educate yourself.

  • On_Safari

    On_Safari

    11 years ago

    Do you think THAT profile would win hearts and penises here? 😘

  • On_Safari

    On_Safari

    11 years ago

    The viewed me section of my profile is beginning to look like a sex offenders register. And Funlover... look outside your window honey 😘 yes there I am....in the bushes 😍

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    OMG Luckdragon, do you know how hot you are right now.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Stir_it_alot' I'll add further to my last... If a male feels emasculated by a woman being his equal, then clearly he's relied on the repression of women as a means to succeed. And that's hardly manly.....that's thuggery. This is an example of what we are missing out on at, "The Rational Male" site... . I’m a huge fan of the rational male and I can’t deny that it helped my a lot in these years. I’m spinning plates and I can literally pull out from the crowd the girl I want to bang. I find really amusing though when I challenge some chicks with the uncomfortable truth of the matrix (e.g. their hypergamy, decreasing SMV with age, the feminine mystique and so on). I wonder which is the common (and the worst) reaction you got from your female friends, girlfriend, women you’re meeting daily when you show them that you know the game they’re playing? I usually get “pffff NAWALT” or “you’re a player” or they seems to be butthurt once they realize I turned the table against them… nothing concrete of course because they know I’m right. any meaningful and/or funny experience? . Can't wait for the day he 'literally' tries to pull me out of the crowd to bang me! I feel so respected...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'I_N_D_A_G_I_N_E' Do you think THAT profile would win hearts and penises here? 😘 For shits and giggles google creepycupid ...

  • Paradisepair

    Paradisepair

    11 years ago

    Feminism's doing just fine...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Arten, I am more than happy to research and debate opposing points of view so I doubt I can be accused of solipsism. Perhaps you could research some statistics on women's ongoing disadvantage, like the levels of sexual assault and domestic violence and the financial ramifications of domestic violence on women and their children. Perhaps you could research the superannuation equity between men and women and how women, because of their caring roles are the ones who end up in poverty as they age because they don't have sufficient superannuation. Statistics last year indicated women are still paid 18% less than men and in industries where women are prevalent, such as child care, age care and welfare services, their pay rates are ridiculously low. Perhaps you could find out why those figures were not published in the Age this year. As for hy·per·ga·my (h -pûr g -m ). n. The practice of marrying into an equal or more prestigious social group or caste. hypergamy (haɪˈpɜːɡəmɪ). n. 1., do you really think it is only women who do that? Just take a stroll through history books and you will find plenty of evidence of men marrying women to improve their station in life, and their finances. And I notice you have not mentioned the men who dump their long standing wives/partners to marry much younger women. Maybe not hypergamy but another action that frequently results in women's contribution to the family being dismissed in property settlements. As for a feminist backlash, do you really think men were that happy with women demanding equality? Of course there was a backlash because feminism signalled the potential end of male privilege and male domination. Can I recommend the Chalice and the Blade by Raine Eisler, a historian at the University of Austria. She explains the ongoing struggle for equality and liberation over conservative, patriarchal values. And yes, I did become heated at your comment, possibly because for 40 years I have been hearing men criticise and try to tear down the very ideals that gave me an access to education, to opportunities, to career choices and to freedom to express myself as a whole human being.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Want to be sandwiched between Luckdragon and Wildsong, so some of them will rub off on me.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    notice the mention of solipsism and truth? So much focus on 'intellect' and 'knowledge'.How enlightened in an 18th Century kind of way.

  • blond_gypsy

    blond_gypsy

    11 years ago

    I come back to my topic and a shitstorm has commenced. Two things that don't go together well: forums and discussions on gender equality.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Equality like freedom is something you can never truly appreciate or understand it's true worth, until you've fought to have it. There's my quote for this month :) - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    In the First World War when soldiers hid in the trenches for too long they got foot rot....talking rot with an entrenched opinion has the same effect...it produces an unpleasant odour.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Wildsong I’m glad you have returned with a cooler head and are to debate the points. I was about to sign off on this topic as being disappointed that all I received was either facile responses or a barrage of venom and invective. Some of the responses from the agitated female members with whom I struck a raw nerve (including yourself) was to be expected as I had read that would most likely occur. Though nothing as outlandish as a radical feminist (in Canada) who was named as “Big Red”. She was later caricatured (on the Internet) for her outrageous egregious behaviour toward men at a University. When one of the males tried calmly to engage her in a debate over the issue she and her followers disagreed with, all she could shout repeatedly was “shut the f**k up” over and over and over in his face. She along with her followers were invited to attend a televised debate later on the issue and none showed up. The take home message there is if you disagree you don’t enter rational debate but resort to facile behaviour and attack the person not the argument. And when I talk about argument I mean it in the philosophical sense not the emotional which many women are fond of lapsing into when not getting their way. I might add that “Big Red” is a bit of a poster girl to illustrate the contemporary, angry, and empowered women that young men should avoid at all costs. I notice from following the forums assiduously there are certain female members who are lightning quick to heap scorn upon a male member(s) who either questions female behaviour or the feminist “sacred cow”. Of course it is “open season” by certain females on males when it comes to illustrating their failings. My endeavour with this post from the outset was to shine a spotlight into the darker recesses of modern feminism and show that all that glitters is not gold. Now I understand your initial reaction was to view my post as a threat to hard won gains for women in the strive for true equality. You have no argument and only support regarding the gains for women. It’s logical as women are also humans that make up 50% (approx.) of the population and should be afforded equal opportunity and not disadvantaged because of their gender. I’m old enough to remember the days when women had to resign from the Public Service, Teaching etc when they got married. They were also paid much less even if they held equal or better qualification within an area. Women could not get loans. If married had to seek husbands permission for a passport and the discriminatory list went on. I certainly concur about the low pay for women in the care industry, especially so for the less skilled. That is a function (I’m not making excuses) of economics I believe and a lack of will from politicians. My neighbour was an age care worker and got paid a pittance for the work she did. Her son’s girlfriend made more than twice her hourly rate selling mobile phones for a lot less effort. Superannuation is a real issue for older women who were in Marriage 1.0 where the husband was the breadwinner and was ascribed to support his family and wife into old age. Problem women face now is who pays (for super contributions) if she decides to exit the work force for a period of time to care for children? I’ll wager that women who are awarded child custody after a partnership is dissolved rarely are living the high life in older age unless she was both clever and beautiful to secure a very fat wallet (man) from who she could get a large settlement plus very generous child care awarded to boot. I’m sure that many women with children from partnership dissolution and single mothers are not too far above the poverty line. I have seen the odd single mother on a “Gum Tree” type site selling her body to cover large household bills or to effect repairs to her dwelling. Of course a woman can choose NOT to have children and follow a career path and if careful accumulate a comfortable to large nest egg for old age. Probably for most the biological pull is too strong to take that path. Mmmm, the conundrum of choice. Domestic violence is a vexed problem which I may add is also increasingly occurring to men but is under reported. That is not to diminish the serious nature that domestic violence poses for women and often also the children. I vividly remember observing as a 17 years old the terrible treatment of a women who lived in the house next door to a place I boarded at for a short while. I found it difficult to understand how a husband could do that as my father treated my mother with the utmost love and respect. Then again my parents were products of marriage 1.0 and worked at making it successful. He was the Captain and she was the First Officer working together to keep the marriage ship from floundering on the rocks. Rather quaint and almost prehistoric with what is occurring today. I think along with many others, Marriage 1.0 has run its course for all but a few and a new paradigm is need. The late Margaret Mead (Anthropologist) postulated in the 1950’s that marriage for life was a big ask and put forth a series of life stage contracts that adapted to how people change over time. Now I understand the underlying issues of domestic violence are complex and I don’t wish to vilify the victims. However I have seen in a couple of cases first hand where the male partner was exhibiting violent traits well before the marriage/co-habitation. I then wondered why the woman persisted with that man when I could foretell problems ahead. That and when I was a young man the perplexing question of why beautiful girls were attracted to cads and no goods. I was puzzled until I read up on the innate hypergamous nature (in a biological sense) of women and all was revealed. Run out of time…. To be continued if desired. Thanks for the heads up on the book. Looks interesting and it will be added to my must read list for 2014. I have a deep interest in Sociology, human behaviour and the influences of societal changes on the individual and how that impacts the dating/mating behaviour of men and women.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'Mesmerised'"Perhaps you could research the superannuation equity between men and women and how women, because of their caring roles are the ones who end up in poverty as they age because they don't have sufficient superannuation.Statistics last year indicated women are still paid 18% less than men and in industries where women are prevalent, such as child care, age care and welfare services, their pay rates are ridiculously low." but isn't that more a function of a woman's life choices than any kind of systemic effort (intentional or otherwise) to keep women down economically?

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Honey if your out there i miss you can you call me ? Are you calling someone else? I so miss my phone stalker :-(( - Posted from rhpmobile

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Can't wait for half time to rush and get popcorn...

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'PyrettaBlaze' Quoting 'Mesmerised'"Perhaps you could research the superannuation equity between men and women and how women, because of their caring roles are the ones who end up in poverty as they age because they don't have sufficient superannuation.Statistics last year indicated women are still paid 18% less than men and in industries where women are prevalent, such as child care, age care and welfare services, their pay rates are ridiculously low." but isn't that more a function of a woman's life choices than any kind of systemic effort (intentional or otherwise) to keep women down economically? I would have to concur with your statement. It appears that certain sections of the Feminist Cathedral wish to perpetuate the myth of unequal pay for ideological reasons. There is a well considered item of academic research (which I cannot unfortunately locate) which demonstrates the claim is false. I have however found this article by Forbes magazine on the matter of pay differential between men and women. As direct links are not permitted then Google "It's Time That We End the Equal Pay Myth" You will also find others contributing to the debate.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    I think the following quote from a "Manosphere" website sums up the current state of play and the difficulties men face in our contemporary society. What seems incredible is there is denial from the female side and it would be all OK if men would only "man Up". Why are there constant articles appearing in MSM (Main Stream Media) aimed at the female audience with titles such as: Why wont men man up. Why can't I find Mr Right rather than Mr Right Now. Why aren't there any Nice Guys which is code speak for "Hot" guys. Interesting reading some of these articles. The theme is the same, women want tall, buffed, confident men who make their "gina" tingle. Mr "Nice Guy" AKA the Beta male that makes up the bulk of the male population just doesn't cut it any more. The following is for your perusal and comment: "No matter what she tells you, no matter how awesome or hot she is, she will always follow the same global programming every woman follows. She will always be hypergamous, she will always defend the sisterhood to some degree. She will expect a man to take care of her even though she works and makes good money. It is important for every man to know that we have to change the way we look at women. Women are NOT going to change the way they look at men, just look around at herbivore/MGTOW like men. Most women cannot even begin to put it together logically that it is THEM who have caused this to happen. A concept I've been thinking about is called "The globalist/individualist" concept. Humans have their global behavior(biological programming) and their individualist behavior(unique to each person depending on environment) As I stated above, women will ALWAYS follow their global programming but how strong of an individual they are determines the amount of resist they develop toward it. The individualist is determined by culture, upbringing, taboo behavior that had been placed upon them. A woman who resides in Saudi Arabia has the same global programming as a woman in the USA. The only difference is the individualist behavior, the two cultures are very different. The woman in Saudi Arabia might have her global programming suppressed to varying degrees. The woman in the USA has no restrictions, infact, she is constantly rewarded for the dysfunctions of her global programming in the form of the state, pussy beggar/mangina validation. What we need to accept as men is that the whole concept of a relationship in the modern world is completely and utterly dead with 0 chance of returning in any mechanized environment. 1. The environment has become too damn dangerous considering women control the political landscape and the vast majority of the spending(wealth). These unfortunate events will continue to poison the environment to have any realistic bond with a woman. 2. Pussy Beggar and mangina's keep finding ways to absolve women from bad behavior by not holding them accountable. This means she never learns any accountability for her actions. 3. Society being terribly gynocentric which means she won't ever see you as a human being. It is and always will be about her wants, her needs, her desires at the expense of yours as a man. I hate to say it but the only way a man can have any sort of "relationshit" with any woman these days would require going to some backwater village of x-backwater country and finding women who had serious restrictions put on her individualist behavior. If you even did such a thing, it still isn't a full proof plan. You could never bring her to any mechanized society because it would re-write her individualist behavior and she'll assimilate accordingly. You can ask the millions of men who thought foreign women are better and stupidly brought them to the USA from their small village in the Philippines. What followed was a re-writing of her individualist behavior, plunged into a "YOU GO GIRL!!" culture which was followed up by a no-fault divorce after the sisterhood had convinced her that she can do better than what she currently has. It is just the simple. All women are the same at the biological level in terms of global programming. Here in the modern world, there is very little in place for her to resist it at the individual level. Mia ling who resides in some backwater village in some backwater country 8000 miles away is forced to resist her global programming as an individualist. Why? Strong taboo's are in place, the culture and upbringing is way more strict, respect is enforced. These all impact her as an individualist despite the same global programming as a woman in x-mechanized western country. Until men are able to internalize AWALT and look past a woman's deceptions, we as men will continue to be in the mess we're in.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'PyrettaBlaze' Quoting 'Mesmerised'"Perhaps you could research the superannuation equity between men and women and how women, because of their caring roles are the ones who end up in poverty as they age because they don't have sufficient superannuation. Statistics last year indicated women are still paid 18% less than men and in industries where women are prevalent, such as child care, age care and welfare services, their pay rates are ridiculously low." I become smart when I'm drunk! Must have been a good session too, as I have absolutely no recollection of writing that.

  • RHP

    RHP User

    11 years ago

    Quoting 'WildSong' Perhaps you could research some statistics on women's ongoing disadvantage (...) Credit where credit is due.