F47
Keira Knightley's boobs
November 09 2014
Comments
-
Tall74nHard9
10 years ago
that ms K was doing such a shoot, but personally it really wouldn't interest me to see her anyway. I think she has a nice face, but her body has never really appealed to me. From the very little I have seen of her or heard about her, she seems a nice enough person and I don't think I would say anything bad about her as a person, but that would be as far as I would go. I just have a hard time warming up to most of the Hollywood type 'celebs' and usually don't pay any of them too much attention at the best of times. Trading on their notoriety is something that just doesn't do it for me, I'm afraid. Tall
-
RHP User
10 years ago
I think every photo which is digitally altered should have to be signed with a watermark stating it has been altered. I think its the only way we will see real photos again... I think she is stunning and its more her soul and character that shines through than just seeing her topless. its a brilliant shot and I congratulate her on it. This current 'norm' of digitally altering photos to make the 'perfect' person which then every impressionable person (myself included) is then led to believe that's the goal we should strive for, not really understanding its actually impossible as that look doesn't exist. While it is nice to think we could dismiss peers and role models's bodies and how they look/dress and say it shouldn't and won't affect us, it is naive at best to think that our younger generation doesn't get heavily affected. Just look at all the kids with one direction haircuts (the boys not the girls liking them) its a simple case of girls like 'this' so I should be like 'that'
-
RHP User
10 years ago
I remember her commenting on a pic of herself for a Chanel ad in 2009, saying "Those things certainly weren't mine". She is obviously happy with her body, and I agree that the fact other people think it's not good enough is ridiculous. Having said that, in my opinion the people responsible for altering the pics are right in thinking they make more money off Keira with larger breasts.I believe that's what our society (read: the norm of what constitutes beautiful and sexy) is sadly still like.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
The Medias fixation with “perfect breasts” is a joke and I do not believe it is reflective of what most men are really looking for. The whole big breast is better crap always appears to be very American based and to be honest I think America has a fixation with bigger is better in just about everything. A recent post on here identified that many men like small breasted women and this ideal/perfect big breasted woman mythology is just that a myth. Airbrushing pics belongs in the realms of fantasy and all I can do is congratulate Keira Knightley as well as all the other women who have come out against this. For the women out there that get concerned about their shape please know that us men are just like you and we all have different preferences in body types. You don’t have to be perfect! We love you with all the imperfections that make you human.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
My left breast was always bigger than my right. It was more noticeable when I was trimmer. As I've put on weight, both my breasts have grown so the difference between them is less but I'm still aware of it. I like having big boobs and most men seem to like them too but of course now I'm concerned with how big my belly is. I've been trying to lose weight for a while but it's not as easy anymore. I'm not as young as I used to be and since I injured my pelvis and back in a car accident two years ago, I'm not as active and exercise is difficult. I've had some success just with diet but now my boobs are starting to droop. It's a vicious never ending battle.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
I just did a Google search on "Keira Knightley topless" and got mostly enhanced and fake naked pics. Things is, Keira doesn't just have small boobs. Put her in clothes and she is effectively flat chested. You can debate small breasts versus big ones, but what if a woman has nothing up top at all? Still as feminine? (Playing devil's advocate here.) And Dom: I you sure you want to use the word imperfections on forum about small breasts?
-
Insomnian
10 years ago
I say good on her. While everyone debates it, what about all the younger woman that are growing up, looking at all the '' perfect proportioned '' woman out there and think, why can't I be like that, I want to be perfect. You hear this so so often from mothers of young children. The world needs to step back and let bodies be what they are, perfect or imperfect. As a society, we have to learn where to draw the line. Good on her for standing up and telling it as it is. There's not a lot of stars out there that would or have done that, maybe a few more should take a leap out of her book and get the younger generation stop hating on their bodies so much.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Keira x - Posted from rhpmobile
-
Tall74nHard9
10 years ago
Quoting 'Meander' I just did a Google search on "Keira Knightley topless" and got mostly enhanced and fake naked pics. Things is, Keira doesn't just have small boobs. Put her in clothes and she is effectively flat chested. You can debate small breasts versus big ones, but what if a woman has nothing up top at all? Still as feminine? (Playing devil's advocate here.) If you have watched the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, KK was in some close fitting attire, and there was , literally, nothing to see. Hence my earlier comments. Really, why bother doing topless shots ? Tall
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Don't particularly care, but I'm glad that she's happy with her body. Small breasted women please form an orderly line at hp's tent 😋😍 Hp xo💋 Because you're worth it...
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Tall - I don't normally pay much attention to Hollywood celebrities but occasionally something perks my interest, like this did. Yes there are many problems with our celebrity-obsessed culture, but like it or not celebrities do influence a lot of people and to an extent they contribute to the shaping of cultural / societal norms. If you don't have an interest in a topic you don't have to post a response. Meander - actually you raise an interesting point about her basically being flat-chested. I've thought before about how I might feel if I had boobs that small, and would I end up wanting surgical enhancement...and I think there's a good chance I would. That does create a bit of a cognitive dichotomy for me, but I know I'd be lying if I said that I wouldn't care at all about having no boobs. I think for most women breasts do play an important role in self-image and self-concept, which is an internalised thing separate from the societal emphasis on them or the fact that most men love them.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
I find her kind of physique incredibly attractive and love women who are built like that. It's the polar opposite to my body, but I don't want to look like that, I just want to take it to bed Seriously though, I love the stance she's taking, I'm an advocate for body love and confidence for all shapes and sizes. I'm a curvy woman but I still find those "men love curves" and "only dogs like bones" memes incredibly offensive. Firstly, we shouldn't be judging ourselves based on what others find attractive and secondly, no one body type is better than another. We don't need to put others down to lift ourselves up.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard' If you have watched the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, KK was in some close fitting attire, and there was , literally, nothing to see. Hence my earlier comments. Really, why bother doing topless shots ? Tall Why shouldn't she do topless shots? Just because she doesn't have much breast tissue (and if you look at the photos she's not completely flat chested) doesn't mean that she shouldn't be able to show off her body and be proud of how she looks. By doing topless shots and refusing to allow them to be photo-shopped she is taking a stance against the Hollywood standard of beauty that very few women can aspire to and you are reinforcing by suggesting that because she doesn't have large enough breasts to fit those standards, she should keep them covered up - fuck that noise.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Meander' I just did a Google search on "Keira Knightley topless" and got mostly enhanced and fake naked pics. Things is, Keira doesn't just have small boobs. Put her in clothes and she is effectively flat chested. You can debate small breasts versus big ones, but what if a woman has nothing up top at all? Still as feminine? (Playing devil's advocate here.) And Dom: I you sure you want to use the word imperfections on forum about small breasts? Part of the Ops post was breasts that are not perfectly symmetrical, size was not what my imperfections comment was about. Hope this clarifies the statement for you.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
You beat me to it, couldn't agree more.
-
QLDtwo4fun
10 years ago
I haven't seen the photos and probably won't, but all breast are lovely. Apart from bra makers,who would want to be in a world where all breast are the same.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Good on her I guess... for the fabulous marketing. So courageous to display that beautiful body without a hint of professional photography about it. What an excellent way of showing the young and impressionable that to get noticed all you have to do is take some gear off. I am now off to have a read of whats been added to the ongoing cock shot debate where it seems that the body beautiful has quite different standards.
-
Circe
10 years ago
I think she looks totally hot, I'd go there in a heartbeat and I applaud her stance. I love that she is taking control of her image. Meander, while I understand you're being 'devils advocate', do you really need to? So much of the collective consciousness is absorbed with judging women's bodies for being unfeminine if they don't reach a certain standard... Fuck that. Feminine and sexy is more than boobs, ask anyone who has had to have a mastectomy. Most people who are into boobs will attest that the perfect boobs have nothing to do with size but with proximity and availability and the person attached.
-
Tall74nHard9
10 years ago
A bit of perspective here please. Luckdragon, I'm not a serial poster and don't contribute to many postings, only the few that also pique my interest from time to time. I was interested to see what KK was up to as, on a personal level, I think she is a nice young lady who usually keeps a level head. I believe that a number of the younger female community take notice of her, and therefore I was surprized by your OP that she was actually prepared to do such a shoot, and commented accordingly, as you invited. KIS, I said nothing against her stance about her doing the shots, and indeed applaud her for doing so without the usual photoshopping enhancements. But if you look at the 'norm' for doing topless / nude photo sessions, it is generally for the purpose of titillation (pardon the pun) as well as to try and enhance their opportunities for further work. I believe that KK is already well received for the purposes of working opportunities, and that she really offers little in the way for titillation for the majority of people. So why bother doing the shoot, in the general sense ? As I mentioned in my first response, I regard her well, and I don't really understand why she would want to go to this length. Tall
-
RHP User
10 years ago
that was cynical, AND slightly humorous! +1 for liking Kiera's boobs. It wasn't as courageous as someone like Annie Sprinkle making a statement, but still...
-
Mischeviouslad
10 years ago
Sooooooo much time..... ..... over such small things.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'MissBlissBomb'Meander, while I understand you're being 'devils advocate', do you really need to? Part of the reason I brought it up was because the small vs big boobs threads are a dime a dozen, but in two years I've only seen one forum mentioning women with no breasts (or just one), and the topic there was sex after a mastectomy. If the fashion/movie/etc. industry finds it necessary to inflate the chests of women with small breasts, how does that (potentially) make those with no breasts feel?
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard'If you have watched the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, KK was in some close fitting attire, and there was , literally, nothing to see. Hence my earlier comments. Really, why bother doing topless shots ? Tall Because boobs don't exist solely to provide men with sexual gratification, and giving men ogle and wank material wasn't ostensibly the main aim of her doing the shoot. Believe it or not, obtaining approval from men isn't always behind the decisions women make when it comes to their bodies. Knightley has said herself that because her boobs are so small she doesn't think that anyone is particularly interested in seeing them (which I very much doubt is true), but she seems happy with her body and she wanted to show how it really looks...imperfections, flat chest and all... to counter the unrealistic photoshopped images and expectations of how women's bodies 'should' look (yes, no doubt she also saw it as a publicity opportunity but hey, that's part and parcel of her job and it doesn't mean she can't be genuine about her other motives).
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Mischeviouslad' Sooooooo much time..... ..... over such small things. You're so clever. And original too.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
DG has plenty of time to spare to make comments that are of no use to the forums. And Tall, how can you speak for "the majority of people"? I think you're only looking at a specific type of naked pics. There are millions ( a guestimate on my part) of editorial and other art photos of people in the buff, that are meant to provoke other feelings than mere "titillation".
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Tall_n_Hard'she really offers little in the way for titillation for the majority of people. Going by the comments on those articles about her shoot I don't know that you are a reliable spokesperson for the majority. Plenty of people (men and women) seem to find her 'titillating', even after seeing her boobs in all their un-photoshopped glory. Just because you don't find her attractive does not make it so for everyone else. Ain't human diversity grand... As for the reason/s why she did the shoot, I think my previous response to you addressed that.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
pretty damn titillating... 😍
-
Mischeviouslad
10 years ago
RIP Humour........ 10.11.14 I guess I'm flattered that Im of such interest to some.
-
Tall74nHard9
10 years ago
bothered to look up the photos of KK, nor therefore have I seen the reasons why she is doing the photo sessions. She may be doing so for some altruistic reasons that I am not aware of, but as I have not followed up on the topic I can't say. Apparently some of the ladies here are aware of the reasons for her photography, but have not had the sense to enlighten the rest of us as to the purpose. I am only offering my views on a general basis, and if you actually read through the whole of my commentary, and read what is written instead of what may be imagined, you will note that I have not derided ms KK, but only to note that she is physically not my cup of tea. Is it that my writing is too complicated to understand for some, or do my postings come out in some foreign language ?? Tall
-
RHP User
10 years ago
:) - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
10 years ago
In my OP I posted a direct quote of Knightley's which basically summed up her stated reason for the shoot, and I then went on to further elaborate on it. So claiming ignorance because you didn't look it up yourself doesn't work. And I didn't say you derided Knightley, I referred to your comment about her not appealing to the majority. Trying to twist things around and take the focus off what you actually said and pretend that it's everyone else who doesn't understand you isn't going to work either. That's the second time you've done it on this thread, and I've seen you do it a number of times on the forums previously (it's a well known psychological technique that I recognise). I'm not going to respond to you anymore on this thread. DG - you're of no interest to me, but tell yourself whatever you like. If you don't have anything to post that actually contributes to the discussion you can stop commenting now.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
What gets me is that Keria is getting kudos for a what is generally described as a courageous move and she is quoted as saying Keria "Because it does feel important to say it really doesn’t matter what shape you are." Yet she has at a very young age already undergone various cosmetic operations (Nose and Lips) and publicly stated in 2006 that she wanted a boob job. I can only see this as blatant hypocrisy. Highly public, filthy rich celebrities in my humble opinion do in no way present any type of realistic roll model for anyone. In her roll as a celebrity it Matter's very much what shape you are, and she seems very aware of this. I don't know much about her, nor have i seen any of the movies she has been in but the more I delve into this the more it looks like she is but a puppet in a marketing machine, namely her most resent £500,000 "does it matter what shape you are?" Chanel Coco Mademoiselle advert. I would say that her going topless and making the above statement is all part of the same marketing push. The blame for peoples anxiety over body image does not fall on photoshoping, or on the media, but firmly and squarely on the public that puts their hard earned cash where the glamour is and those that can not separate that dream world from reality. There is noting wrong with seeking perfection, and the Trillion dollar plus beauty industry (including surgery) is proof that looking good is a major human concern.
-
lovman8
10 years ago
I think kk has beautiful boobs. Just my opinion. And I admire her attveritude and stand with the topless photos. However a women's attractiveness is determined by far more than breast size ot even the existence of breasts. Attitude and personality are far more important factots in sexiness and attractivenessattractiveness.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'Blindman67' What gets me is that Keria is getting kudos for a what is generally described as a courageous move and she is quoted as saying Keria "Because it does feel important to say it really doesn’t matter what shape you are." Yet she has at a very young age already undergone various cosmetic operations (Nose and Lips) and publicly stated in 2006 that she wanted a boob job. I can only see this as blatant hypocrisy. It's one thing to change things you don't like about your looks yourself (I agree about the nose job and lip implant), but it's another for people to alter you without your consent. Also, she may have said she wanted a boob job in 2006 (I didn't check), but she would have been 21 at the time and it sounds like she has changed her mind about whether to alter her body or not in the last eight years. I certainly thought and said things at 21 that I'd never say now. Does that make me a blatant hypocrite too?
-
MsJonesy
10 years ago
Are we all becoming too removed from what a real body looks like? Why do we have to photoshop pictures - and who is this faceless arbiter of fashion and taste who decides what we view? I'd like people to google the following: womans-post-mastectomy-body-labelled-offensive and read what the reaction was to this woman's honest pictures.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Quoting 'kissk' I'd like people to google the following: womans-post-mastectomy-body-labelled-offensive and read what the reaction was to this woman's honest pictures. Wonderful. One of the comments: "As a man, I am humbled and amazed at the courage and dignity of these amazing women. I am somewhat overwhelmed by the courage of these beautiful women. The last thing I am is horrified!"
-
Mischeviouslad
10 years ago
I was asked to post something of interest (to one person)...who says Im of no interest to her but clearly interest enough to compel her comment to me. So here goes. Kiera Knightly has small breasts. So?!
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Maybe you are a hypocrite, all depends on what you said and your intent. I will throw stones in a glass house without fear as I am a right royal piece of work and claim nothing above just being human.I am pathologically anti pop culture and resent the fact that martyrs are so easily made from those whose scruples are plainly laid bare. KK does not, in me at least, present a great mind, or say anything new. Not for one second can i make my self believe that she actually thinks it does not mater what shape we are. All I can do is review the facts, and present my case for no other reason than debate. I always will do my best to stop madness taking hold when all around worship idols without a clue. I am sure you all know of someone crazy that made much more of a statement then presenting small tits askew. Now there would be courage worthy of admiration if sexy Angelina Jolie's double mastectomy was presented for public review. Could you look? of course you would, what a perverse bunch we are.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
One woman is heartened by Ms. Knightly's stance then her job is done.The point she is making as I see it,is that the reality of women's bodies is somewhat different to the photoshopped enhanced images presented to us as reality...impossible standards that women and men often adhere to....women wishing,men wanting.Her point is not about whether or not anyone has a sexual preference for her very small breasts'but that this IS her body,not her fictionalised body...Commentary on whether or not you find her breasts attractive or not,seems to me to be wilfully and totally missing the point.Kudos to Keira,and to you L.D,for this post xxFreya
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Highly public, filthy rich celebrities are people too, who grow, evolve and mature. Many have change the direction of important social and political issues by the public stand they take. Many have grown to understand their position as role models and social commentators. Whether they want to be in that position or not, many have come to accept it and use it for good. Emma Stone and her partner Andrew Garfield started (or at least gave strength to) a trend where celebrities use the value of their papparazzi photos to support other causes. They do this by holding up signs with messages about causes so the pap takes their photo but only sees the sign. Halle Berry and Jennifer Garner are fighting in court to have legislation introduced so that children have rights of protection against the appalling papparazzi intrusions that put them at risk physically and often reputationally. Sure, this will protect their children and the children of other celebrities, but also any children (of friends, family, general public) caught in the crossfire of pap lust. Brad Pitt has led the construction of numerous houses in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, partly because he has a passion for architecture and the means to fund (directly and through donations to his foundation) the work, but also because he was frustrated at the slow pace of renewal and the people left homeless and abandoned at the hands of the bureaucracies. Mark Zukerberg has just donated 25m to the fight against Ebola, when the UN has been pleading for countries to do so because their simply hasn't been enough of an international response. He's also added a donate to stop Ebola button to FB, the first I've seen like that on the site. Bill and Melinda Gates funded and established The Global Fund, a private fund dedicated to the eradication of malaria and more. Celebrities are people. Many of them use their influence and wealth for good in the world. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Like I said. I am pathologically anti pop culture (a nut case). But point taken Burning_L, I idolize people that most will never have heard of, the quite achievers that contribute to human knowledge and achievement, including Bill and Melinda Gates (way back when every one hated them), who I would in no way place in the same category as filthy rich celebrates, though they have become that but not via an active want to be so (I think). I would never stand in the way of philanthropic causes, but will stand in the way of any that pretend as there is a fine line between giving to humanity and taking from humanity. Sometimes I am a little blind and do not see the line, and sometimes I am just an arsehole.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
I wasn't commenting on what you are or aren't. But your self-assessment made me laugh :) I simply think that we rarely actually know anything much about anyone outside of our immediate circles. Most of what we think about people is just a massive assumption, created from our own values and biases. Which means it's our problem, not theirs. There's usually more to a person than their 'persona', whether it's their celebrity persona, their persona on here, their persona at the office or wherever. And if you consciously choose to look for the good in a person, and for the good that they're bringing to the world, most times you'll find something worthwhile. After all, we're all just humans trying to make the best of things. Sure, we all do things to hurt people and piss people off and out of selfish personal interest at times, but we're still people just being people. All as good and awesome as each other.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
So Zuckerberg topped Australia by 5 million. I feel bad.
-
RHP User
10 years ago
Brilliant post. Agree 100%. 👍
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 14361 Comments: 120840
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1355 Comments: 14709
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2425 Comments: 17234
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2405 Comments: 12737
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 794 Comments: 5154
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1148 Comments: 6957
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 622 Comments: 2145
-
LGBT
Topics: 156 Comments: 1150
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share