M66 F54
Profile photo suddenly restricted?
February 04 2013
Comments
-
RHP User
12 years ago
is it this bottom? Or her front bottom?Because I can see her back bottom with a black G.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
which photo are you talking about OP ? cause I can see what Freya can see....hmmmm
-
RHP User
12 years ago
OP were you posting from RHP mobile? I've noticed it on mobile app but not on the PC, many photos on the phone are restricted
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Through a phone app? Pretty much anything is too hot on iphone app
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I think it means that people on the RHP app will not be able to see your photo. I know some of my pictures are like that.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Just checked Fun2Play, your picture is restricted on the RHP application.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I don't get it... there are no naked boobs or nips!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Mmmmm.....Wonder why Shinas left to puzzle
-
RHP User
12 years ago
My last profile pic (pretty much the same pose as the one I have now, only I have nothing on but the G strings), I have had for about 6 months and had it as my main pic for about three weeks, was suddenly deemed too hot and I had to change it about 3 days ago... I'm thinking gosh, everyone and their dog has seen it by now... Why the sudden change of heart? Though topless it wasn't even showing my boobs as I was laying on my stomach... I can see others who have their boobs out... puzzled, I was actually wondering if I'd pissed someone off.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
politics perhaps
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I think apps are much more restrictive, because they have to conform to Apple (Google etc.)'s guidelines, which are strictly no porn or anything 'offensive'. Apple are pretty notorious control freaks with things like that.Mr Tryst
-
uneventful
12 years ago
Brcause i can swe current rear bottom pic on my phone- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
This is only for "guest" as its happen to us a few time when we have change our pics, all member will still see your pics on your profile....The way I read what they told us in that guest can see all clothed pics but not any that are naked or part naked.......Some people pay to see everything and some don't pay.............GT
-
JessicaRabbit
12 years ago
Quoting 'tryst_and_shout' I think apps are much more restrictive, because they have to conform to Apple (Google etc.)'s guidelines, which are strictly no porn or anything 'offensive'. Apple are pretty notorious control freaks with things like that.Mr Tryst As Mr Tryst said, Apple are the fun police here, that's why it's only on the app that the photos have been made 'hot.' Which pretty much cancels out 90most of my pics Didaxx
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'DidacticTactics' As Mr Tryst said, Apple are the fun police here, that's why it's only on the app that the photos have been made 'hot.' Which pretty much cancels out 90most of my pics Didaxx I just took a look at your profile and your pics and I must say the 18 pics I saw where great and very sexy..... GT
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I think the sole reason for censorship is to push paid memberships up, there seems no reason to stop people looking at sexual images when tonnes of .com.au sites clearly have no legal problem with it, all it requires is a disclaimer "I am over 18 ENTER" "EXIT" feature and there you go, the reason must be financial.Perhaps RHP would like to clear it up?.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'nameisinuse' I think the sole reason for censorship is to push paid memberships up, there seems no reason to stop people looking at sexual images when tonnes of .com.au sites clearly have no legal problem with it, all it requires is a disclaimer "I am over 18 ENTER" "EXIT" feature and there you go, the reason must be financial.Perhaps RHP would like to clear it up?. The reason is that: if you wish to so all pics on a persons profile you must be a financial member and you will find this with any adult dating service, as a guest you do not get to see any part or nude pics, so if you are to tight to pay for a membership then you put up with RHP's rules....If you read the rules when you signed up it does tell you what you can do and what you can NOT do..As we are only Premium we only get a small amount of thing we can do but if you are PremiumPluss you are a lot more, NOTHING is FREEGT
-
RHP User
12 years ago
When those annoying threads get bumped from eons ago that even tho the pc has no picture on a deleted profile the app displays a picture of the person.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Yeah I noticed that too. I bumped a recent topic and a my heart did a little flutter. Mr Spunky bum Stalky was there. Miss him from the forums.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'gtbi_mm' Quoting 'nameisinuse' I think the sole reason for censorship is to push paid memberships up, there seems no reason to stop people looking at sexual images when tonnes of .com.au sites clearly have no legal problem with it, all it requires is a disclaimer "I am over 18 ENTER" "EXIT" feature and there you go, the reason must be financial.Perhaps RHP would like to clear it up?. The reason is that: if you wish to so all pics on a persons profile you must be a financial member and you will find this with any adult dating service, as a guest you do not get to see any part or nude pics, so if you are to tight to pay for a membership then you put up with RHP's rules....If you read the rules when you signed up it does tell you what you can do and what you can NOT do..As we are only Premium we only get a small amount of thing we can do but if you are PremiumPluss you are a lot more, NOTHING is FREEGT All of the above are free so to speak, the exact value of NOTHING as far as I know hasn't been quantified, but I'm sure as you state it would be free. I am indifferent regarding the pictures I can and cannot see, if I wish to see porn there are trillions of images available for FREE on the internet, my point is that there is no reason RHP stops the publication other than revenue.The irony of being a proud paid up member who is being charged a monthly fee in order to upload pictures for free which the company then charges other people to see is obviously lost on you, I take it you aren't being paid a commission?. The notion that being a paid up member gets you maximum exposure is also ironic by the current logic, as you are a paid up member who is not getting the best exposure for their dollar, if anything it should be the case that paid up members get all pictures shown, cheapskates only clothed and guests only the grey man/woman.I expect you would retort with the argument that you only wish to deal with paid up members, which aside from narrowing your perspective target audience even further doesn't take into account that it's highly likely you send messages to attractive single females who are only guests, rendering the argument null and void.My initial post merely pointed out that there's no reason that with the use of a disclaimer everyone could see the pictures people like yourselves are paying the privilege to upload (for nothing in return other than limited exposure), and your target audience could be expanded even further.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'nameisinuse' Quoting 'gtbi_mm' Quoting 'nameisinuse' I think the sole reason for censorship is to push paid memberships up, there seems no reason to stop people looking at sexual images when tonnes of .com.au sites clearly have no legal problem with it, all it requires is a disclaimer "I am over 18 ENTER" "EXIT" feature and there you go, the reason must be financial.Perhaps RHP would like to clear it up?. The reason is that: if you wish to so all pics on a persons profile you must be a financial member and you will find this with any adult dating service, as a guest you do not get to see any part or nude pics, so if you are to tight to pay for a membership then you put up with RHP's rules....If you read the rules when you signed up it does tell you what you can do and what you can NOT do..As we are only Premium we only get a small amount of thing we can do but if you are PremiumPluss you are a lot more, NOTHING is FREEGT All of the above are free so to speak, the exact value of NOTHING as far as I know hasn't been quantified, but I'm sure as you state it would be free. I am indifferent regarding the pictures I can and cannot see, if I wish to see porn there are trillions of images available for FREE on the internet, my point is that there is no reason RHP stops the publication other than revenue.The irony of being a proud paid up member who is being charged a monthly fee in order to upload pictures for free which the company then charges other people to see is obviously lost on you, I take it you aren't being paid a commission?. The notion that being a paid up member gets you maximum exposure is also ironic by the current logic, as you are a paid up member who is not getting the best exposure for their dollar, if anything it should be the case that paid up members get all pictures shown, cheapskates only clothed and guests only the grey man/woman.I expect you would retort with the argument that you only wish to deal with paid up members, which aside from narrowing your perspective target audience even further doesn't take into account that it's highly likely you send messages to attractive single females who are only guests, rendering the argument null and void.My initial post merely pointed out that there's no reason that with the use of a disclaimer everyone could see the pictures people like yourselves are paying the privilege to upload (for nothing in return other than limited exposure), and your target audience could be expanded even further. You sound like you have problems with being a paid member, if this site was free to all then we all would be Guest and not have any paid members, and I do not get any commission at all.....If you are not happy with the way RHP's has their set-up then take it up with them......It will not change so stop being a tight arse and pay for it, if you want to see all .....You don't have any pics on your profile but want to see every one esle's pics free, sounds like you want everything free..SORRY reality check scrooge: Things in life are not always free, sometime you must pay.....If pepole like us and every other paid member on here did not pay you would not be here bitching about how unfair it is as there would not be a RHP site......That's the troble with young people today they want everything free, its al about ME, ME, ME, ME, ME, ME...........If you have more to say about RHP's site take it up with them not me,,, all I did was say how they work and I am happy to pay for what I get........ So pay up or shut up......PSS I do contacted guest on here if they have enough on their profile for us to contacted them, if they cant be bothered to say much we cant be bothered to contacted them........GT
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Thanks everyone for your responses - and loving the 'front bottom', 'rear bottom' descriptors :)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
That's what you took from my reply?, I'll leave it for the intelligent people to interpret my post, but it seems to quite clearly state I am completely indifferent and finishes with perhaps RHP could explain, sadly they didn't respond and you did. That's the trouble with old people today, dementia and no comprehension of basic English or spell check facility.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I got a message on Saturday saying the same.... My pic is boobies with a black cammy but the SUGGESTED pic by RHP is of my bare breasts... I emailed asking why and was told the 'my breasts could be seen through the top' - but they didnt answer my follow up question of why bare boobies were acceptable.... Not much on here makes sense to me anymore.......
-
RHP User
12 years ago
We are with nameisinuse. It's obviously the case , it's about the money not the member. When we were paid members we should have be allowed to decide who see's our restricted photos not RHP!!!!!!. unfortunately members who we didn't particularly what or need to see our restricted photos can provided they have paid up , but members who we want to see our restricted pics, can't if their guests. It's become a " you pay us and we will show you other people's restricted photos " . It's all smoke and mirrors. RHP help section explains that we can not see "restricted photos" as guests because RHP cannot be sure we are over 18 and they are trying to protect the kiddies which is responsible. However this does not compute when we are 1. Verified 2. Validated 3. Have been paid members for past 2 years only recently reverting back to guest member due to disappointment in lack of change in giving RHP members more in control of their paid for profiles. Why are we now treated like they don't know who we are or if we are over 18 or not? RHP knows we are . If its a case of we can't see restricted photos until we pay RHP membership money, then that should be reflected in the help menu. Unfortunately we got the same standard response we get for all suggestions : your suggestion will be referred to management ! Which is a big " restricted " black hole.
-
JessicaRabbit
12 years ago
Quoting 'Hebe1' When we were paid members we should have be allowed to decide who see's our restricted photos not RHP!!!!!!. You do have this option - it's called Private Galleries??? As has already been said, if some people didn't pay up, none of us would have RHP.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
What option ? We have private gallery !!!! Makes zero difference ! Guest can not see restricted photo whether they are in a private gallery or not!!!! And we understand someone needs to pay but if you read our post you would see we are talking about the profile holder deciding who sees their restrict photos NOT Rhp using the photos to lure people to pay up whilst restricting who we want to see them. Using the under 18 excuse to stop us from viewing photos in private galleries that members have forwarded is BS , they know we are over 18 due to our past membership. Any paying single profile ( mainly single guys) can see our pics even though we are not interested in them . Anyway , we are just repeating ourselves .
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Hebe1'What option ? We have private gallery !!!! Makes zero difference ! Guest can not see restricted photo whether they are in a private gallery or not!!!! And we understand someone needs to pay but if you read our post you would see we are talking about the profile holder deciding who sees their restrict photos NOT Rhp using the photos to lure people to pay up whilst restricting who we want to see them. Using the under 18 excuse to stop us from viewing photos in private galleries that members have forwarded is BS , they know we are over 18 due to our past membership. Any paying single profile ( mainly single guys) can see our pics even though we are not interested in them . Anyway , we are just repeating ourselves . and totally get what your saying.......
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 14361 Comments: 120840
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1355 Comments: 14709
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2425 Comments: 17234
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2405 Comments: 12737
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 794 Comments: 5154
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1148 Comments: 6957
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 622 Comments: 2145
-
LGBT
Topics: 156 Comments: 1150
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share