gang bang

Comments

• 

  RHP User

  13 years ago

  I have been to a few gang bangs and they can be fun or not depending on how you like your sex. I have been to gang bangs with one lady and six guys and another gang bang with four ladies and about twenty guys. Either way you have to wait your turn and staning around naked, waiting to have sex can be a turn off or a turn on. The best way to approach it is to go to one and see how you go. One word of advice though, always and I mean ALWAYS use a condom. Not to do so is irresponsible and stupid and you run the risk of catching an STD which could kill you. It is not worth it. I have seen some gang bangs advertised where the women prefer the men not to use condoms. Stay well clear of those. Notwithstanding catching an STD, there would be nothing worse than having sex with someone on sheets soaked with cum. YUK.

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  10 years ago

  Interesting. You have to wait in line. Hmmmm

  reply

  like

• 

  AnnieWhichway

  10 years ago

  At times its bumper to bumber, so to speak. Play trains?

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  10 years ago

  Choo choo trains and daisy chains are just a few of my favourite things.

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  10 years ago

  Another favourite thing is making cum angels. I mean what is ChrisJM talking bout! He be cray cray.

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  9 years ago

  Quoting 'CHRISJM' One word of advice though, always and I mean ALWAYS use a condom. Not to do so is irresponsible and stupid and you run the risk of catching an STD which could kill you. It is not worth it. This is bad advice. Condoms are only 80% effective a stopping STI's. Yes use condoms, but know it only reduces your risk of catching a STI, it does in no way protect you. One contaminated condom puts all involved at risk. For the woman all a man has to do is touch the outside of the condom after touching him self to put you at risk. Condoms do not protect you from STI's the only marginally reduce the risk for the woman. Here is some statistics of catching the most common STI Herpes for both men and women, with and without condoms (Natural). The gang involves 5 men and 1 woman and considers the prevalence of Herpes-2 at 1 in 5. Please note how much risk as a woman you put your self at even when you ensure condom use. Risk per man with Condoms:3.03% or 1 in 33 Risk per man with Natural:9.40% or 1 in 10 Risk per woman with Condoms:16.83% or 1 in 6 Risk per woman with Natural:48.81% or 1 in 2The best way to reduce the odds of catching an STI is to require that all have had an STI check and have not had more than 5 partners. It does not matter if they have use condoms or not. The stats assume that one quarter of the people in the gang bang will lie about being tested. This also considers that the Herpes test can miss 5% of infections Risk per man with Condoms:1.03% or 1 in 100 Risk per man with Natural:2.90% or 1 in 33 Risk per woman with Condoms:4.88% or 1 in 20 Risk per woman with Natural:15.54% or 1 in 6 The best protection is to ensure all have been tested for herpes (and other STI's with proof) and that all are aware of STIs and practice safe sex (not condom type safe sex but awareness safe sex) and would not knowingly have sex with an STI Risk per man with Condoms:0.21% 1 in 500 Risk per man with Natural:0.62% 1 in 161 Risk per woman with Condoms:1.03% 1 in 100 Risk per woman with Natural:2.92% 1 in 33

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  9 years ago

  Quoting 'Blindman67' The best protection is to ensure all have been tested for herpes (and other STI's with proof) and that all are aware of STIs and practice safe sex (not condom type safe sex but awareness safe sex) and would not knowingly have sex with an STI Risk per man with Condoms:0.21% 1 in 500 Risk per man with Natural:0.62% 1 in 161 Risk per woman with Condoms:1.03% 1 in 100 Risk per woman with Natural:2.92% 1 in 33 I'm not arguing with the stats n this one - but this one seems to ditch the "some people lie" fudge factor that you included in the earlier bunches. But what I will say I like that you've shown the raw percentage - too often we're not told a raw percentage, we get told "twice as likely" - where "twice as likely" is a huge difference if you're looking at 20% jumping to 40%, but if it was 0.01 - 0.02 then its both such a small amount it might as well be the same.

  reply

  like

• 

  AnnieWhichway

  9 years ago

  That fucking soapbox is getting rickity..... I know its a slow day in the forum but dont start again. You are trawling Still love you though.

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  9 years ago

  And if you are in NSW you will now have to ask them which dentist they have been to over the past 10 years. :p

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  9 years ago

  Quoting 'Meeka100' And if you are in NSW you will now have to ask them which dentist they have been to over the past 10 years. :p bugger... what questions do they ask? I go to my father... that'd be awkward

  reply

  like

• 

  RHP User

  9 years ago

  Quoting 'S_OnTheLoose' Quoting 'Meeka100' And if you are in NSW you will now have to ask them which dentist they have been to over the past 10 years. :p bugger... what questions do they ask? I go to my father... that'd be awkward Syd, there was a story about two dentists in Sydney that are lacking in their procedures and haven't kept up with recommended hygiene practices - it was on the news this last week. They are staying that they may have potentially exposed up to 11,000 people to the HIV virus so they are telling people to get tested... if they went to these two dentists.

  reply

  like