M42
What Guys Think About Sex
May 22 2013
Comments
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Thank you! Now I am afraid you may be banished from the boys club for giving away secrets! LOL So Innerwest the little head basically rules your big head and you are all held to ransom by your raging hardons. Wonderful
-
RHP User
12 years ago
And an insightful summary Meeks. I have to say this sort of thing makes it difficult for women in that we find it hard to know for sure if a guy likes us genuinely or if he just wants sex. I think it's why many of us don't make the first move... Fear that he'd just say yes to get laid not because he likes or is attracted to us... Next question... How can we tell??
-
RHP User
12 years ago
You can tell if he contacts you the next day. If he doesn't then it was all about the sex. Actually even then it can be all about the sex. Personally I just assume it is all about the sex unless he tells me otherwise. If I am interested enough I have even been known to ask them outright. Meh.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
The answer to that is: you can't. You're not (I assume) a mindreader, so you have no absolutely certain way of knowing. However, that is actually immaterial to the situation. If you're having sex with a guy because he likes you, you're doing it for the wrong reason... ... Have sex with someone because YOU like THEM, and you want to. That's it. That's really the only thing you have control over. Giving up sex isn't going to make someone worthwhile like you. If they're worthwhile they're gonna like you for a range of reasons, certainly including sex, but not only it. Failing that, just have sex with me. I'm fun and really really like sex a lot. Go on, I'll be your best friend! That offer is open to you too, meeka. Don't nobody say I ain't got moves.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Can I just please clarify how this came about. In the Slut thread SirLurk said that sluts are women who have the morals of a man. So my question was, what morals do men have when it comes to sex?Well it seems by inference and now by Innerwest's thread. Men are sluts. Is that a fair conclusion? Now before some of you get your knickers in a knot... this is obviously a generalisation not all men are the same as Innerwest describes.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Well done sir....jolly good job in fact. I applaud your foresight into the arrival of my input, with even the expectation that I will try to refute such claims that you make. But I won't be. The fact is, that yes some men do see a need to spread their seed into as many vaginal cavities as they can, as do some women lay down after the 2nd glass. After all it does take 2 to tango right?? For some, keeping count on how many cum stains can be achieved on the sheets in one night IS their very own individual idea of a fucking great night out. But don't be fooled OP into thinking that that's EVERY man and woman's dream night out or in, or both!! Those type of people I shall leave to mingle together for many o dry cleaning bills to come. I personally will stick to the partners that challenge my mind, before my body, as my choice is and always will be more meaningful than a hot shower and a few beers at 3am on some meat markets dance floor. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
wingman2014
12 years ago
If the guy is patient and not full on pushy then he may see longer term potential in you.....If he is pulling out all stops to get into your pants then you can be sure it's just about the sex. Then,If he calls you back you are in full control of the situation...not all guys are comfortable with that- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
men just wanna have sex,,who woulda thunk it...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
The saying that was quoted "sluts, are just women with the morals of a man" also doesn't aim to call either sex a slut, or infer a mans morals when it comes to sex. What it DOES however do, is present the view, that what's good for the goose, is good for the gander. It's aim, is to empower women into being proud of their sexuality, as, if the boot was on the other foot, we'd be calling them studs....- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
crickets from the boy's corner ...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
for me, its all about the sex.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
social convention normally dictate concealing this :)
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
...are we permitted to comment on the editorial piece this time?DG
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Think op may have something.....however for most of us ( those not in high school), it's not all about dick wetting. Unfortunately we cnt and don't fuck 24/7 , comes a time when we realise that 95% of our time isn't spent fucking and we may have to talk, inhabit, work, dream, share with this " goal hole" we have been depositing our potential offspring into. The male slut phase is something most men go through but generally, get over , once a little maturity kicks in, we stand up to the peer pressure of bed post notching. I love and admire women still as much as I did as a pimply arsed teenager, just these days don't frothe at the mouth, nostrils flared, out rampant cock and hunt them down, from an uncontrolled urge to fornicate, for me if it happens it happens, my choice as much as theirs and (maybe I'm getting fussy in my old age) if I don't like what options are available I simply obstain. Sure there ar men who think and act differently, as there are women who do, boring world if we all we the same..;)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
3am, meat market dance club... That is not a goer. I tend to agree with mutefrog. For me, and feel free to disagree OP, In a one on one situation, if I don't know the person it's not going to happen. I'm not one for one nighters. I have always preferred to know my partner. There is a line of respect to your partner and to yourself. Im not going to shag someone just to get my rocks off. If I sleep with someone its about their pleasure over mine, and I treat them with respect. If they're openly looking for a onetime thing which is how I read your example, then they can approach someone else.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I agree with your comment. But I guess my statement is using the word slut to mean someone who is promiscuous and sleeps around with LOTS of people. So do you think the majority of men, particularity young men, are promiscuous? It seems like if a guy can get always with it they will boink as many women as possible! To me, men and women differ as most women will develop a sense of attachment with a regular partner whereas I think men don't necessarily form any emotional bond.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Ok, so I grew in a capital city, I went to a public school and then university. I played rugby as a teenager until I was 20 and have worked in the construction industry for most of my career. Most of the guys I grew up with weren't promiscuous. I admit that there were some, in fact one was a very close friend that took it upon themselves to sleep with any woman with a pulse, but most didn't. If they met a girl, or in one case a boy, and went home with them, they'd follow it up afterwards...to the best of my recollections, most of my close male friends haven't had a one night stand. There are three of us that are now divorced, out of a group of 15 that have been close friends for over 15 years. Even now, with far more sexual maturity and just more mature in general, none of us feels comfortable with just getting another notch on headboard. It's much more fun following it, developing a friendship and going from there. It makes the following experiences all the more enjoyable, wether its just as fwb or something more...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Men will usually up their 'root tally' to appear more macho, and women will usually drop theirs so as not to appear slutty. It's a shame these double standards exist... Generally men will take whatever they can get I think.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Men will usually up their 'root tally' to appear more macho, and women will usually drop theirs so as not to appear slutty. It's a shame these double standards exist... Generally men will take whatever they can get I think.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot'Well done sir....jolly good job in fact. I applaud your foresight into the arrival of my input, with even the expectation that I will try to refute such claims that you make. But I won't be. The fact is, that yes some men do see a need to spread their seed into as many vaginal cavities as they can, as do some women lay down after the 2nd glass. After all it does take 2 to tango right?? For some, keeping count on how many cum stains can be achieved on the sheets in one night IS their very own individual idea of a fucking great night out. But don't be fooled OP into thinking that that's EVERY man and woman's dream night out or in, or both!! Those type of people I shall leave to mingle together for many o dry cleaning bills to come. I personally will stick to the partners that challenge my mind, before my body, as my choice is and always will be more meaningful than a hot shower and a few beers at 3am on some meat markets dance floor. - Posted from rhpmobile you sound a little prissy there honey. Just because people like a lot of sex and with different people, does not mean they are some dirty skanky people who have more cum stains on the sheets than a csi crime scene. so you dont give out on the fist date then?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Whats a fist date?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot' Well done sir....jolly good job in fact. I applaud your foresight into the arrival of my input, with even the expectation that I will try to refute such claims that you make. But I won't be. The fact is, that yes some men do see a need to spread their seed into as many vaginal cavities as they can, as do some women lay down after the 2nd glass. After all it does take 2 to tango right?? For some, keeping count on how many cum stains can be achieved on the sheets in one night IS their very own individual idea of a fucking great night out. But don't be fooled OP into thinking that that's EVERY man and woman's dream night out or in, or both!! Those type of people I shall leave to mingle together for many o dry cleaning bills to come. I personally will stick to the partners that challenge my mind, before my body, as my choice is and always will be more meaningful than a hot shower and a few beers at 3am on some meat markets dance floor. - Posted from rhpmobile ---Me, i'll take both.Spur of the moment, out of nowhere shags with women youve just met and really hit it off with - either because of too much booze, or just a general attraction - is a very fun thing to enjoy. So can be the RHP-fuelled meet-n-hookup.Are these the only ways in which I like to meet, and possibly have sex with, women?Fuck no, but they sure are fun.Honestly, I don't think taking some sort of fake-ass moral-highground "oh, I only like to be with partners who engage my mind and spirit and heart" and whatever other oprah buzzword BS makes one any more justified than anyone else.My own approach: if everyone's happy, then why not enjoy yourselves, and there are many ways to skin that cat.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
what do guys think about sex?.............well some of us don't see...'any hole as a goal'.....and never have..... some of us can and do practice restraint.... and can manage to say 'no' where others wouldn't. sex is something I always saw as sacred and to be treasured...like an exotic gift even...and I always felt that if I hadn't worked for it, I didn't deserve it.... and sex with someone I wasn't attracted to? wtf ? going without seems a much more attractive option.... I'd rather date a woman, and get to know her first, before dragging her off to the bedroom...or allowing her to drag me to hers....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
smell of testosterone in the evening !
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'anybodyjustnow'Whats a fist date? holding hands and gazing into each others eyes the art gallery and me having you up against a picasso
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Its any NEW hole
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'mikeandshel' what do guys think about sex?.............well some of us don't see...'any hole as a goal'.....and never have..... some of us can and do practice restraint.... and can manage to say 'no' where others wouldn't. sex is something I always saw as sacred and to be treasured...like an exotic gift even...and I always felt that if I hadn't worked for it, I didn't deserve it.... and sex with someone I wasn't attracted to? wtf ? going without seems a much more attractive option.... I'd rather date a woman, and get to know her first, before dragging her off to the bedroom...or allowing her to drag me to hers....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
that's how we knew it, because the light went off once you closed the car door. The other one you'd hear was "backshots" which was used a lot by the black guys I played basketball with. Its where you have hot bodied girls with dog faces that they'd fuck doggystyle so they didn't have to look at them.- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
no...its absolutely not 'any' new hole....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
what fucks with my head is that women think men have no standards and aren't able to say 'no'....its not true. 'no' is an incredibly easy word to say...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Lean him up against the Pollock, that way no one will notice any excess splatters ... ;-)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
So go ahead, label me a prissy frigid. But is there really anything wrong with wanting an intelligent conversation before a physical interaction?? So many women express this on their profiles, and on these forums, that they're not a "free whore" I think Tuscan was your post?? Yet the minute a man decides to enjoy her as a person a bit BEFORE engaging her sexually, he's seen as "prissy" or having "an Oprah Winfrey, fake ass moral highground." - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot' So go ahead, label me a prissy frigid. But is there really anything wrong with wanting an intelligent conversation before a physical interaction?? So many women express this on their profiles, and on these forums, that they're not a "free whore" I think Tuscan was your post?? Yet the minute a man decides to enjoy her as a person a bit BEFORE engaging her sexually, he's seen as "prissy" or having "an Oprah Winfrey, fake ass moral highground." - Posted from rhpmobile ---thats not really whats being said. its not so much being prissy or frigid, or adopting some sort of siege mentality about your point of view here. Its about an implication in your words that theres some sort of moral high-ground to be had, or that in saying 'i enjoy casual sex' one does not enjoy 'not-so-casual sex'. i mean, who the fuck that isnt emotionally stunted, or 17, or both, DOESNT enjoy having a conversation or an intellectual connection with people they have sex with on a regular basis? to go out of your way to state how you need a mental, spiritual, emotional connection (or whatever), or even worse - to me - going on like some other dude here was about sex being some sort of divine gift ( i mean for fuck sake, its just sex, get over it) before having sex isnt prissy as much as it is arrogant.its arrogant because whether you mean to or not, youre implying that youve somehow cottoned on to something others havent.for me, sex is great, and there are lots of different ways to enjoy how great it is, from casual one-nighters where you meet someone and just hit it off to the extent that youre tearing each others clothes off a few hours later, or arranged RHP-style hookups, to taking it much slower with someone you know and really like and doing the whole courtship deal, theyre all just as valid as each other - as long as the parties involved are enjoying it.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Well said. Some people take sex very seriously!! Now I don't really give it out much regardless of my going to swingers and sex clubs but I can not understand people that take it all so seriously. I was seeing a guy a few years ago who used to shoosh me in the bedroom. No laughing please sex is a serious business. Oh pulease!!! A lot of us place far too much emphasis on sex and it's supposed importance. Now I just have to learn to let go a little but more.... I have a chick who is showing me how. Now bend over my sweet I have something here you would enjoy. ;-)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Meeka100' Now bend over my sweet I have something here you would enjoy. ;-) ---You first!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot'So go ahead, label me a prissy frigid. But is there really anything wrong with wanting an intelligent conversation before a physical interaction?? So many women express this on their profiles, and on these forums, that they're not a "free whore" I think Tuscan was your post?? Yet the minute a man decides to enjoy her as a person a bit BEFORE engaging her sexually, he's seen as "prissy" or having "an Oprah Winfrey, fake ass moral highground." - Posted from rhpmobile i'm with you on this.... its much much more appealing to have sex with someone you 'know' ....and being able to 'trust' and 'like' them certainly helps...never been one for sex with drunken strays and never much liked the woman who behaved in this way...connection and conversation is very much part of the whole sex thing, and not all of us men are geared to poke anything with a pulse..... thankfully.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I asked a friend of mine, to attend the Clipsal 500 with me earlier this year. I had originally planned on going it alone, as I always do.... Just prior to our planned weekend, I was stuck in Grafton NSW due to the pacific highway being flooded...I received our normal phone call that we quite often had.....then the bombshell hit, the dreaded question "are you expecting sex this weekend?? Cos I don't do expectations or pressure!" My reply, "is that the only reason you think I asked you to attend for?? To try and get my dick wet??" So this left me rather confused, and I'm now asking why is it NATURALLY ASSUMED that just because a man has asked a woman to attend a night out, or in this case a weekend, that I want to or EXPECT a fuck at the end of it??? Can't 2 PEOPLE that get along really well just enjoy a car race or whatever the event, WITHOUT THE EXPECTATION and feeling PRESSURED into having sex??? Why is it that sex seems to be the focus and intention behind EVERY interaction??- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
It's not to say I don't enjoy sex, or that I don't want sex, whatever the context of the sex..... I WANT a balance between FUN and SEX.....- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
It's easy to man bashand easy to think that all men are like thisMost men aren't...some are and some have a bit of this.meh
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I've just lost my mojo, maybe I AM a prissy little frigid.....maybe I think too much, who knows?? Or maybe even I just need to man the fuck up, and fuck anything and everything......just because its awesome - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot'I asked a friend of mine, to attend the Clipsal 500 with me earlier this year. I had originally planned on going it alone, as I always do.... Just prior to our planned weekend, I was stuck in Grafton NSW due to the pacific highway being flooded...I received our normal phone call that we quite often had.....then the bombshell hit, the dreaded question "are you expecting sex this weekend?? Cos I don't do expectations or pressure!" My reply, "is that the only reason you think I asked you to attend for?? To try and get my dick wet??" So this left me rather confused, and I'm now asking why is it NATURALLY ASSUMED that just because a man has asked a woman to attend a night out, or in this case a weekend, that I want to or EXPECT a fuck at the end of it??? Can't 2 PEOPLE that get along really well just enjoy a car race or whatever the event, WITHOUT THE EXPECTATION and feeling PRESSURED into having sex??? Why is it that sex seems to be the focus and intention behind EVERY interaction??- Posted from rhpmobile its the focus because that's the limit of many peoples imaginations. if more people thought of life outside of their underwear....we'd all be much happier... and I think...many more relationships would last the distance.
-
chevtrek
12 years ago
No way I have had chances with stunning women and said no mostly because I hated there personality I have had sex also at the drop of a hat with many women as I am no gibson-decaprio or sheen.. I was a DJ in the late 70s and 80s and this was a great time as the DJ was top dog and without a brag had more than my share.. I even got into the pants of a now famous girl. So my reply is even at this age I have chosen to be selective and if I dont like a gal its no bloody way.. Steve..
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'innerwest123' subject title because i have to - seriously can this be ditched?I dare you to come up with a funny subject title for every single one of your posts.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Interesting answers!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Ms_Devious' Quoting 'innerwest123' subject title because i have to - seriously can this be ditched?I dare you to come up with a funny subject title for every single one of your posts. ---Tell you what - for a benefit of the doubt, its a deal!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot' So go ahead, label me a prissy frigid. But is there really anything wrong with wanting an intelligent conversation before a physical interaction?? So many women express this on their profiles, and on these forums, that they're not a "free whore" I think Tuscan was your post?? Yet the minute a man decides to enjoy her as a person a bit BEFORE engaging her sexually, he's seen as "prissy" or having "an Oprah Winfrey, fake ass moral highground." You are right, my comment is out of line. Thanks for that slap I deserved it- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot'I asked a friend of mine, to attend the Clipsal 500 with me earlier this year. I had originally planned on going it alone, as I always do.... Just prior to our planned weekend, I was stuck in Grafton NSW due to the pacific highway being flooded...I received our normal phone call that we quite often had.....then the bombshell hit, the dreaded question "are you expecting sex this weekend?? Cos I don't do expectations or pressure!" My reply, "is that the only reason you think I asked you to attend for?? To try and get my dick wet??" So this left me rather confused, and I'm now asking why is it NATURALLY ASSUMED that just because a man has asked a woman to attend a night out, or in this case a weekend, that I want to or EXPECT a fuck at the end of it??? Can't 2 PEOPLE that get along really well just enjoy a car race or whatever the event, WITHOUT THE EXPECTATION and feeling PRESSURED into having sex??? Why is it that sex seems to be the focus and intention behind EVERY interaction??- Posted from rhpmobile look I did call you a prissy thing,and for that I am sorry, but sometimes you are like a babe in the woods,when it comes to sex and rhp stuff. listen to this, a dude put an add in the paper, my friend is single and wants to meet a guy for a date as she is shy I sent the guy the text he had looking for the right girl , wine and dinner and tra lah lahh so i sent a text, got a niceone back, sent her face picture said lets meet for coffee and I will come with her as she as a tad nervous ok he says send a picture of me so he will recognise us both, sent a normal picture just both her and i face shot then he gives me no end of grief...show me your tits, do you want to see my cock after I told him, I was a married woman who would chaperone my friend arshole is ringing me now , so for most women its always a risk thing that a guy wants tofuck your brains out because he bought you a coffee. try having a cunt and tits and you will soon learn the hard way, its not as nice as you think it is in the world of women. yes there are nice men but they are usualy still living with their mother and get a hard on over a star treck movie. ok having a bad day not all men are arseholes and not all women are whores, but today is bitch day for me after that twit from the so called nice end of the date field. tr mega bitch
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I thought a fist date you needed a pocket full of lube ,and patience?............ Shit TR you could do me against a Rolf Harris wobble board pic for that matter!.. ;)
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'FourHands'It's easy to man bashand easy to think that all men are like thisMost men aren't...some are and some have a bit of this.meh everytime a woman says something about men...we bash the poor luvs looks like us little ladies need to zip it. An opinion about a subject is not bashing its like an arshole,bit smelly an you may not like it but its MY fucking smelly opinion and just because I have tits does not mean I cant comment on mens behaviour, they can comment on mine and they do.
-
hornyguy112
12 years ago
I have said no plenty of times.. .... Said hell yes a bloody lot more though :) lol If im a slut , so be it. Im out : /- Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'mutefrog69'I thought a fist date you needed a pocket full of lube ,and patience?............ Shit TR you could do me against a Rolf Harris wobble board pic for that matter!.. ;) and the only thing wobbly would be my knees
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I'm not sure why, actually I am. I skim through the first paragraph (of everything you've posted so far) & that's it. You don't happen to work for the west do you?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
First for me if I'm with a woman that loves sex as much as me and secondly she has to be able to make me laugh and 3rd she has to have respect but a slut in the bedroom she has all that I would give her anything she ask and treat her the way that type of woman deserves to be treated.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
No apology needed.....it doesn't matter the label, it doesn't matter the stigma, I'll wear ANY title that people wish to paint me with, if that's what it means to be true to oneself...... I also don't see the point to your story. One person from the "good side of dating" still doesn't speak on behalf of me, or any other man. He speaks alone. I think you're more surprised at the fact you got it wrong with that guy, based on the fact that he was from the good part of the dating scene. If I were to say ALL women were headfucks I'd get spanked, and have been in a recent thread.....which was a great little experiment too I might add. I may very well be in my infancy(if you call 3 years infancy here), but that should never mean that I drop MY standards or my beliefs, and accept a fuck just because its on offer. - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Longnthickmik I don't know if you are praising women who are sexually adventurous or dissing them. Do tell us. How should a slut be treated? - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
SO FAR ON THIS SITE IVE WONDERED ABOUT ?S ASK THAT ARE OBVIOUS AS SEX IS A ENJOYMENT TO EVERYONE, JUST DEFERENT WAYS , FETISHES , EDURANCE LEVELS , SOME PEOPLE EVEN TAKE LONGER TO BE SEXUAL SATIFIED YEAH AND THERES JUST DIFERENT SEXUALITIES , M/ F IF YOU DIDNT LIKE SEX AND AND DONT THINK ABOUT SEX YOUR NOT ANIMAL/ HUMAN YOUR A OBJECT LIKE A CHIAR , EVEN THOUGH IVE SEEN SMALLER CHIARS THAT LOOK LIKE BIGGER CHIARS SO MABE THEYS REPRODUCED AND DO HAVE AND THINK ABOUT SEX MABE ... LOL BUT YEAH SEX ISNT SOMTHINK I AND MOST PEOPLE QUOTE M/F THINKABOUT ALLTHE TIME BUT ON THIS SITE I HAVE NOTICED QUTE A FEW REGULARS ON HERE 24/ 7 , I DO WHEN IM EXTREMELY ATRACTED TO A FEMALE THAT SHOWS SAME INTEREST IN ME , JUST CARNT GET ENOUGH... YEAH I DO AGREE WITH SOME PIONTS MADE BY OTHER MEMBER ABOUT HOW MANY NOTCHES BLOKES GET, QUOTE WOMEN THEY FUCK AND ITS MY BELIEF WOMEN ARE , WORES SOME I MAY ADD .. HEY IVE BEEN KNOWN TO GIVE WOMEN LIKE OTHER MEMBER HAS QUOTED ANY HOLE , A BANG BUT FOR ME IT WAS SEE WHAT HAPPENS YOU MIGHT HAVE COMMEN INTEREST , CLICK AND HEY DIDNT WORK AS I NO MY TYPE MABE DESPARATION OR BAD IDEA NOT ASHAMED IM HUMAN, AND SOMETIMES GOING AWAY FROM YOUR TYPE MAY CONFIRM TO YOU ON YOUR TYPE ....IVE ALSO GOT THIS PONDER ABOUT OTHER SEXUALITIES THAT FIND HESTRO SEXUALS LIKE MYSELF AFFENDING THEM BUT I DONT CHECK THERE PROFILES THEY CHECK MINE A GUESS ITS A STIR OR THERE THINKING ABOUT SEX WITH ME , AND MY ASS HOLE TIGHTENS UP MY DFENCES GO UP AND THE BARBED WIRE OR RAZER WIRE COMES OUT OF THE WALL OF MY RECTEM , QUOTE ASS HOLE ...LOL MY OPION MY ASHOLE.. SEX TO ME IS SOMTHING YOUR HAVE WITH ANOTHER F OR TWO THATS JUST ATRACTED TO YOU AS THERE ARE TO YOU AND NO ITS NOT JUST LOOKS ITS ATTITUDE , PERONALITY, COMMEN INTEREST , A COMBINATION .. AND WEST YOU ARE UNDERNIGHABLY RIGHT IN YOUR IN DYCEXTING AND DIAGNOISES OF A ?( TRUE) I THINK EVERY ONES DIFERENT AND HAVE STAGES ADJUSTMENTS , BEEN THERE DONE THAT , SOMTIMES BAD ATTITUDE TREATING SEX LIKE A GAME BUT THERE HUMAN THERES NO DENYING THAT ,MASTAKES ARE MADE BY EVERY ONE UNTIL THEY FIND THERE TRUE SELVE BY EXSPARIMENTING , TRY BEFORE BUY... WEST GREAT PIECE OF WRITETING .. PS.. DONT REPLY WITH LEARN HOW TO SPELL I ALREADY KNOW IM OFF SOME TIMES LOL
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
Quoting 'Meeka100' Longnthickmik I don't know if you are praising women who are sexually adventurous or dissing them. Do tell us. How should a slut be treated? - Posted from rhpmobile ...and...... those women who dont meet his tick of approval.... how does he view how they "Deserve to be treated"?!IE.... is there a difference?!DG
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot' No apology needed.....it doesn't matter the label, it doesn't matter the stigma, I'll wear ANY title that people wish to paint me with, if that's what it means to be true to oneself...... I also don't see the point to your story. One person from the "good side of dating" still doesn't speak on behalf of me, or any other man. He speaks alone. I think you're more surprised at the fact you got it wrong with that guy, based on the fact that he was from the good part of the dating scene. If I were to say ALL women were headfucks I'd get spanked, and have been in a recent thread.....which was a great little experiment too I might add. I may very well be in my infancy(if you call 3 years infancy here), but that should never mean that I drop MY standards or my beliefs, and accept a fuck just because its on offer. - Posted from rhpmobile ---please see the -for once useful - subject header.
-
LouAnn
12 years ago
Totlly new to me. Lol but then I am one of the female versions of men and proud!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Sorry, delayed reply, it's all a bit busy... Just wanted to say that I think you slightly misunderstood me... I think that it's difficult for a woman to approach a man because she doesn't know if he would just say yes because she would just be a hole to stick it in without him being attracted. Personally I wait for him to make the move only because I think he will only do so because he is attracted. I do sleep with people I'm attracted to but don't have a problem with saying no either. Ummm, I think the sex is better if there's a real attraction and connection. That said sometimes that happens very quickly.
-
LouAnn
12 years ago
My thoughts exactly
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Words are like a glove, they can be turned inside out by you, or me, or anyone. (George Bernard Shaw) Why would somebody cheat as an excuse for their behaviour? What behaviour are they trying to excuse and how are they excusing it by cheating? :p Any hole is not a goal, all metaphors are false, a vagina is not a net behind a wooden frame, that's just bravado. And as much as anyone can say that 'anyone who refutes this is full of bullshit' then anyone who claims to have knowledge of everyone else and acts like they are using it to gain favour with the opposite sex maybe...is not feeling...like Jesus loves them? He does you know ;) Why doesn't someone tell me why my whole upper body quivers when I see a picture of Jessica Rabbit? Does anyone else get that? - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
andthough and one that I believed should have been on the table before I go away for a weekend with anyone. I do apologise if that offended you. As I recall the Clipsal was a great weekend. As for this public venting, I find it hurtful and I'd like it to stop. I am always open with my partners that I do not want a relationship. I have enough going on in my life and I have plenty of great friends. Any sense of a negative vibe then I've got my running shoes on. There has been plenty of that of late. If that makes me a slut, then so be it. As for the topic. If I understand the OP correctly, the same goes for women. Not any cock will do. BUT, I will not apologise, nor will my sexuality be questioned, judged or hung out to dry on a public forum because I like to have 2 glasses of wine and lie down, or chat to anonymous people about how many come stains were on the bed in the morning.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
now where did I drop my bucket?
-
RHP User
12 years ago
If I choose to floozy with men in a bar at 3am then I will! And if I want to talk about sex all day I will! :-p *fuck I just found my bucket. Some arse has crapped all over it*
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Meeka100'I agree with your comment. But I guess my statement is using the word slut to mean someone who is promiscuous and sleeps around with LOTS of people. So do you think the majority of men, particularity young men, are promiscuous? It seems like if a guy can get always with it they will boink as many women as possible! To me, men and women differ as most women will develop a sense of attachment with a regular partner whereas I think men don't necessarily form any emotional bond. A lot of confusion around these types of debates come from what meaning is put to the word "slut", whether it be used in regards to women or men. We've always thought the original meaning or use of the term was to mean someone who fucks a lot of people indiscriminately, without standards. Not simply someone who fucks a lot of people. A sexually confident woman (or man for that matter) can have sex with lots of different people, and still have impeccable standards about who they do that with. In our minds, that's simply a person who is comfortable with their sexuality, and likes a bit of variety! But then there are those who may just fuck anyone, just for the sake of it, without really caring who it is - and we would think of that as "slutty" behaviour. But it appears in many of the discussions on here, the term gets used to describe both types of people we've just mentioned, and the debates become confusing. Just a thought.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Sorry I only skimmed the OP and a few posts, short attention span, just like all men you understand. I really just wanted to get to the bit that would get me laid.Can't find it now and I'm annoyed. Women are such cock teasers, all these provocative posts and not one has offered to blow me. I'm a man and I expect that if a women is talking to me, or at least near me, that she is showing some interest in blowing me.Sex. More sex. Where can I get some sex. Sorry did I just say that aloud? Must keep thoughts to myself...I'd love to respond thoughtfully and point out that this long, cliched, scientifically dubious topic is just another cynical attempt at giving the market what the OP thinks they want. Can't though, need to masturbate thinking about Paintme's sexy choker.It's tough being a man.Mr C
-
RHP User
12 years ago
byaway by MrsC' talents that night ..... I'd have been in for sure!!!! MrsC is one amazing woman!!!!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
*misses her macbook* boo hoo
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'chickcara' Sorry I only skimmed the OP and a few posts, short attention span, just like all men you understand. I really just wanted to get to the bit that would get me laid.Can't find it now and I'm annoyed. Women are such cock teasers, all these provocative posts and not one has offered to blow me. I'm a man and I expect that if a women is talking to me, or at least near me, that she is showing some interest in blowing me.Sex. More sex. Where can I get some sex. Sorry did I just say that aloud? Must keep thoughts to myself...I'd love to respond thoughtfully and point out that this long, cliched, scientifically dubious topic is just another cynical attempt at giving the market what the OP thinks they want. Can't though, need to masturbate thinking about Paintme's sexy choker.It's tough being a man.Mr C---Feel free to put your own succinct, pithy, carefully researched and annotated thoughts up on the forum for us to have a look at.Or, you know, just sit on the sidelines and have a bit of a pissweak snipe without actually saying anything at all... Your call.Wow, this sort of passive-aggressive cheap shot really *is* easy and fun!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Kudos for everything you just put out there. Everything.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'paintme' byaway by MrsC' talents that night ..... I'd have been in for sure!!!! MrsC is one amazing woman!!!! I have to agree, but did I miss something?
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
Quoting 'innerwest123'Get over yourself princess....then..... please see the -for once useful - subject header. As said in the emails you sent me..... when you draft and post a topic, and you clearly put a lot of time into the lengthy topics you create, to express your opinion..... ... you accept the good, or the bad, and debate the points accordingly if necessary.So unless you ask for ONLY opinions from people who agree with you (which seems to be the case if recent complaints to admin and subsequent editing is any indication.....) .......then youre not really asking for others' opinions at all, and your topics are merely Editorials. Cake...Eat it.Choose.DG
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Nup ... It's napalm. Not my cup of tea :-/
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Mischeviouslad' Quoting 'innerwest123'Get over yourself princess....then..... please see the -for once useful - subject header. As said in the emails you sent me..... when you draft and post a topic, and you clearly put a lot of time into the lengthy topics you create, to express your opinion..... ... you accept the good, or the bad, and debate the points accordingly if necessary.So unless you ask for ONLY opinions from people who agree with you (which seems to be the case if recent complaints to admin and subsequent editing is any indication.....) .......then youre not really asking for others' opinions at all, and your topics are merely Editorials. Cake...Eat it.Choose.DG ---Again DG, youve misunderstood. That wasnt really what was being said. The responder has come on here, and ive answered his reponse, as have others, to which he has taken a VERY defensive tone. THAT defensiveness is what i was answering.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Miss Something? I surely didn't!!! Saw the whole sexy lot!!! Dear Rhp mods. Sort this iPad problem. :-/ I'm sure it turns lots of people off when trying to post stuff.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Rhp mods, my knickers are in a knot and I forgot to say please.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Love the topic, love to see so many men respond.Great topic. Lets hear more
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I was thinking the same thing until I got my knickers in a twist. ...
-
RHP User
12 years ago
With her knickers and inspirits boobies in her mouth...*
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'innerwest123' Feel free to put your own succinct, pithy, carefully researched and annotated thoughts up on the forum for us to have a look at.Or, you know, just sit on the sidelines and have a bit of a pissweak snipe without actually saying anything at all... Your call.Wow, this sort of passive-aggressive cheap shot really *is* easy and fun! What I said with a very healthy dose of sarcasm is that the standard "all men are bastards" theme is more appropriate in satire than in serious discussion. Like any generalisation, it is wrong more often than right, but others have pointed that out already.It's scientifically dubious in that your assertion that humans are driven by rational thought is unfortunately incorrect. In fact we are "predictably irrational". We often make poor choices due to systems of thought designed over millions of years of evolution to allow us to react quickly, rather than with careful thought.I'd also take you up on cultural grounds that we in fact do not value promiscuous men on the whole. Sure there's a period in adolescence where conquest is important, but cultural norms in our predominantly Christian society value a stable husband who doesn't cheat. Review a topic on cheating here for some crystal clear examples.My final point is that the topic struck me as being crafted for a purpose. Nothing wrong with that, particularly when it's an interesting topic that generates some debate or humour. But be prepared to be called on it.I enjoy the debate in the forums, but personally value short and sweet topics and posts over essays. I try to keep mine the same (just a personal preference, not saying there's a right or wrong).Now I really do need to go and have sex.Mr C
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'paintme' Miss Something? I surely didn't!!! Saw the whole sexy lot!!! Read it again and I get it now.
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
Misunderstood? Incorrect. The very lengthy and topic is the result of considerable effort. It is though, still an opinion/editorial, where the author refuses to permit alternative comment. Kind of defeats the purpose of an open forum really. So I wonder if it's the shared viewpoints of forum members that yoorderly, or merely the spotlight of attention and validation from only those who share your view? I guess we'll see. DG
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
yoorderly?You seek.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
MrC may I spank your botty? While mrs C sucks your cock? HAAWWWTT! I still fantasise about how she does that with her red lingerie ....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
MrC may I spank your botty? While mrs C sucks your cock? HAAWWWTT! I still fantasise about how she does that with her red lingerie ....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'chickcara' Quoting 'innerwest123' Feel free to put your own succinct, pithy, carefully researched and annotated thoughts up on the forum for us to have a look at.Or, you know, just sit on the sidelines and have a bit of a pissweak snipe without actually saying anything at all... Your call.Wow, this sort of passive-aggressive cheap shot really *is* easy and fun! What I said with a very healthy dose of sarcasm is that the standard "all men are bastards" theme is more appropriate in satire than in serious discussion. Like any generalisation, it is wrong more often than right, but others have pointed that out already.It's scientifically dubious in that your assertion that humans are driven by rational thought is unfortunately incorrect. In fact we are "predictably irrational". We often make poor choices due to systems of thought designed over millions of years of evolution to allow us to react quickly, rather than with careful thought.I'd also take you up on cultural grounds that we in fact do not value promiscuous men on the whole. Sure there's a period in adolescence where conquest is important, but cultural norms in our predominantly Christian society value a stable husband who doesn't cheat. Review a topic on cheating here for some crystal clear examples.My final point is that the topic struck me as being crafted for a purpose. Nothing wrong with that, particularly when it's an interesting topic that generates some debate or humour. But be prepared to be called on it.I enjoy the debate in the forums, but personally value short and sweet topics and posts over essays. I try to keep mine the same (just a personal preference, not saying there's a right or wrong).Now I really do need to go and have sex.Mr C---Dont get me wrong, I appreciate your response, and definitely noted the sarcasm - hence my own sarcastic reply.Firstly, I'd respond that making generalisations about generalisations is a hell of a way to reinforce your point about generalisations.I really don't agree that it's scientifically dubious or definitively 'incorrect' as youve stated, which really is far too concrete a statement to make, unless of course you can point to theory that proves this conclusively. I think, like in most discussions, a 'middle road' is a more accurate perspective - i.e. that humans are both irrational AND rational. Having said that, I was making a fairly blase point on a forum on the internet, with no supporting evidence or links to such. Nor am I a behavioural psychologist, or an evolutionary biologist. Let's save that particular serious discussion for them, shall we?I would counter that by saying, well really despite census info from 2011 that says 61% of australians identify as some flavour of christian (because really, how many of this actually practices), and respond that Australia is a secular nation. Next, I would point, again, to popular culture and the myriad examples of an idealised male as being sexually promiscuous. Im not going list, you know exactly what I'm talking about.The value of a spouse who doesnt cheat is rapidly declining, as sexual mores evolve. news.com.au for example almost actively spruiks the website ashleymadison.com which is a personals site devoted ENTIRELY to extra-marital affairs.Your final point is utterly correct, but its also missing an actual defining statement. What, I wonder do you think the purpose was?I'll answer my rhetorical - this post, like ALL my posts - is jsut for the hell of it. Its purpose is to stir up some discussion and maybe make a person or two laugh. I mean, for fuck sake, Im making conclusive statements about the behaviour about 51% of the global population. Im doing that for a reason: to play a bit of devils advocate.Why? Because I find that fun.My posts are not really long. They tend to be around the 700 word mark. This takes me, generally, about 10 minutes.Cheers again for your reply. I really enjoyed reading it, and especially trying to respond to it.enjoy having sex!
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Mischeviouslad' Misunderstood? Incorrect. The very lengthy and topic is the result of considerable effort. It is though, still an opinion/editorial, where the author refuses to permit alternative comment. Kind of defeats the purpose of an open forum really. So I wonder if it's the shared viewpoints of forum members that yoorderly, or merely the spotlight of attention and validation from only those who share your view? I guess we'll see. DG ---once again, and ive said this to you a number of times now - its time you started actually believing it... this is NOT a lengthy post, and was NOT the result of considerable effort.this sort of thing takes me - at most - about 10 minutes.why do i write it? Because its fun. its a fun little diversion.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
I am with MischeviousLad on this one.innerwest123 first you state that 9 times out of 10 men will sleep with a woman after being offered sex?You are wrong. Sure some men are like that,but to say all men are like that is just naive.Its like saying "all food taste the same, because its food!"I am not a liar because i don't agree with your 9 time out of 10 theory ,i am a man that dose not need to sleep with heaps of women to feel like a man.Some men need more than just sex ,they would like a connection ,to feel a spiritual happiness that will sooth their soul. Some men enjoy a relationship over quick pleasure.Not everyone is hard wired like a poodle in heat.Sorry innerwest ,no need to speak on my behalf ,i am man enough to do that myself,and be responsible for my own actions.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Please inner west is full of it.......if it was just about sex....we could get a jar of cream and make lust to that....why would we bother for coffee, dinner or drinks - Posted from rhpmobile
-
RHP User
12 years ago
its been offered to me, here, and elsewhere, on a plate. and its so very easy to say 'no thanks' and walk away...why? because I love my wife, I respect her too much to betray her, and I love the life I have with my entire family. i'm 51 this year, and have never betrayed any of the women I've been with, and wont begin now..... not for anything. 1 at a time is so easy...more men should try it....
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'sirlurkalot' I asked a friend of mine, to attend the Clipsal 500 with me earlier this year. I had originally planned on going it alone, as I always do.... Just prior to our planned weekend, I was stuck in Grafton NSW due to the pacific highway being flooded...I received our normal phone call that we quite often had.....then the bombshell hit, the dreaded question "are you expecting sex this weekend?? Cos I don't do expectations or pressure!" My reply, "is that the only reason you think I asked you to attend for?? To try and get my dick wet??" So this left me rather confused, and I'm now asking why is it NATURALLY ASSUMED that just because a man has asked a woman to attend a night out, or in this case a weekend, that I want to or EXPECT a fuck at the end of it??? Can't 2 PEOPLE that get along really well just enjoy a car race or whatever the event, WITHOUT THE EXPECTATION and feeling PRESSURED into having sex??? Why is it that sex seems to be the focus and intention behind EVERY interaction??- Posted from rhpmobile This is the entire premise of the post ... you disagreed with it vehemently and then you tell a personal experience story that reinforces its accuracy. The OP even foreshadowed your comment .."They're full of shit. Maybe not consciously, maybe because they're trying to impress others with an 'enlightened' or 'sensitive' attitude"
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'innerwest123' Quoting 'chickcara' Quoting 'innerwest123' I really don't agree that it's scientifically dubious or definitively 'incorrect' as youve stated, which really is far too concrete a statement to make, unless of course you can point to theory that proves this conclusively. I think, like in most discussions, a 'middle road' is a more accurate perspective - i.e. that humans are both irrational AND rational. Having said that, I was making a fairly blase point on a forum on the internet, with no supporting evidence or links to such. Nor am I a behavioural psychologist, or an evolutionary biologist. Let's save that particular serious discussion for them, shall we?Work by psychologists Khaneman and Tversky is the most instructive. Try Khanemans book "Thinking Fast and Slow" for an excellent introduction. There are numerous works in economics that have built on their work and it's fact that we frequently make irrational choices. Also well established is that evolution in humans is hundreds of thousands of years in the making. It's only in the last few hundred that we've started to rely less on instinctive reactions and more on considered thought and planning. While difficult to "prove", it's obvious both in theory and in the results of the experiments by Khaneman and many others - we have evolved to rely first on quick thinking instinct and have to work or be prompted to engage more careful thought.I would counter that by saying, well really despite census info from 2011 that says 61% of australians identify as some flavour of christian (because really, how many of this actually practices), and respond that Australia is a secular nation. Next, I would point, again, to popular culture and the myriad examples of an idealised male as being sexually promiscuous. Im not going list, you know exactly what I'm talking about.Our culture is clearly built on Christian values, no matter how many of us still attend a church. With rare exceptions, the "idealised" promiscuous maile in popular culture is typically shown to be flawed, troubled, and ultimately lonely. It's a standard in fiction, but Tiger Woods and Shane Warne are great real life examples if you need a couple.The value of a spouse who doesnt cheat is rapidly declining, as sexual mores evolve. news.com.au for example almost actively spruiks the website ashleymadison.com which is a personals site devoted ENTIRELY to extra-marital affairs.There's always been cheaters and there always will be. Do you really think though that the value of a non-cheating spouse is declining? Perhaps ask the partners, or as I said, review a few topics on cheating here for the counter point. Your final point is utterly correct, but its also missing an actual defining statement. What, I wonder do you think the purpose was?I mentioned it twice. The topic is based on a generalisation that may resonate with some women, and if so would paint the author as a fresh alternative to the rest of us bad guys. It's a lot more subtle and interesting than "do girls like big cocks", but marketing just the same. The problem with it is that the competition will respond in kind, and they did.I'll answer my rhetorical - this post, like ALL my posts - is jsut for the hell of it. Its purpose is to stir up some discussion and maybe make a person or two laugh. I mean, for fuck sake, Im making conclusive statements about the behaviour about 51% of the global population. Im doing that for a reason: to play a bit of devils advocate.Why? Because I find that fun.Sounds good. Hope you find the counter arguments and challenges just as much fun.Cheers, Mr C
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'chickcara' The topic is based on a generalisation that may resonate with some women, and if so would paint the author as a fresh alternative to the rest of us bad guys. It's a lot more subtle and interesting than "do girls like big cocks", but marketing just the same. The problem with it is that the competition will respond in kind, and they did. Pretty much sums up whe I stayed clear of this one.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'paintme' MrC may I spank your botty? While mrs C sucks your cock? HAAWWWTT! I still fantasise about how she does that with her red lingerie .... Mmmm that would be hot, but when it comes to a good spanking I'm definitely a giver not a receiver Mr C
-
RHP User
12 years ago
- Well done on trucking out some references, and displaying your relevant knowledge. I'll refrain for 2 good reasons: 1 - my own area of knowledge is (obviously) not in this area, and I don't have some handy references (that I'll take the good taste option of taking your word for their veracity), and 2 this being a forum on a hookup website... well, Horses For Courses, is I guess what I'm getting at here. Suffice it to say that there would be an interesting and thoroughly inconclusive discussiont o be had about that topic.- Our LAWS are built on a Christian basis, our culture has markedly moved away from this, hence Australia identifying itself as a secular nation. This in particular is the weakest part of your response, and I'd honestly prefer not to continue with it. However your brief read of the promiscuous male is interesting - do you feel that the promiscuous male is shown to be "flawed, troubled, and ultimately lonely" *Because* he is promiscuous, or could it be read a little more deeply as the author expressing their own perceived flaws, seen through the prism of an idealised, sexually successful male? I would argue further that whatever the case, the fact remains that despite these characters being portrayed largely as you (i feel) correctly summarised, the characters themselves are still idolised.- I do think that the value of a non-cheating spouse is declining, if only in the sense that peoples notions of sexuality seem to be fairly rapidly changing. While I myself have never done so, and don't think I ever would, I see it quite a bit, and just the mere fact that website like the one I mentioned exists and PROUDLY markets itself as what it is - a site for people to cheat on their partners is some solid evidence to show this might just be the case. You mentioned a number of forum posts to the opposite point of view - I have also seen (and I'm sure you have) posts here expressing opinions about extra-marital sex in an entirely different light...- Yeah I know you mentioned it, I just wanted you to spell it out for those playing at home, as this is really what youre talking about - your feeling that I'm 'marketing' myself through posts like this as some sort of 'alternative' to other guys here, for whatever reasons, and you felt you had to - as youve already stated - "call me out" on this.Here's the thing about pinning on the ol' tin star on your chest, strapping on the six-shooter, saddling up and heading out to call out people on forums, like you feel they should be: pretty soon its clear that there are plenty of others wearing the same tin star on their chests, and you find yourself being called out on things you say, and all of a sudden, discussions get nice and circular and we end up with the Flame War at the RHP corral.For example, your little performance up there with your academic references on a - again - forum on a hookup website, and your oh-so-profound reading of my apparent motives for writing this post - and isn't that profundity, and the articulate way in which you express it, a nice little bit of 'marketing' itself. Now, this may or may not have been your aim (i dont think it was), but in jumping out to try and call me out on whatever bullshit you think I'm up to, youre basically doing the same thing. further, if we really want to get all 'meta' about forum posting and break it down in the - possibly insulting to some - way that you have mine here, and say well, "your post about guys thoughts on sex is no different to a post titled "LOL DO GURLS LYK BIG COX (cos i have one ;)' - youre just trying to get your end wet, but being a little more clever about it", then we're getting a little too first-year postmodernism, which just results in 'why bother posting anything?' - as essentially, if we think along the lines of all posts here are the same: a way in which to get women hot for us, then theres no point in writing anything.except of course, I assume, your own posts.Just to be clear: I wrote this - and my others - because I find it fun. I like to write, its good for me to write pointless little things like this as it works as a sort of exercise to help me with other actually-important things I'm trying to do (with not a great deal of success at the moment, the words just arent coming). That's my motive, that, and that alone. If you choose to read this or any other post I write as some sort of way in which to get women to fuck me, then that's up to you.I have really enjoyed your responses. Thank you for taking the time to write them.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Was that it was a fantastic weekend without the sex.....it was supporting my point that not every male wants, needs or even looks toward every encounter as a lead to sex.....if I've omitted part of that story I apologise, but it was not intended as a vent of any description at anyone..... but you lot will always see what you choose to see.....- Posted from rhpmobile
-
Mischeviouslad
12 years ago
Patronising, condescending, petulant, controlling and an egotistical last word approach.Sorry innerwest.Ive enjoyed your writings in the past..... but you've lost me with your attitude on this one.DG
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Quoting 'Mischeviouslad' Patronising, condescending, petulant, controlling and an egotistical last word approach.Sorry innerwest.Ive enjoyed your writings in the past..... but you've lost me with your attitude on this one.DG ---Time and again youve utterly failed to understand what ive said, despite being told in black and white. Time and again youve chosen to think the worst of what ive said. The other guy has written some thoughtful, interesting responses that have had more than a few barbs in them also, and ive responded in kind. If youre not able to see that, then cheerio, pal.So, let me just clarify: you saying 'ive lost you' is no big loss for me.
-
RHP User
12 years ago
Who said boys don't get their periods. :p
Boards
-
Hot Topics
Topics: 14361 Comments: 120840
-
Girls Ask
Topics: 1355 Comments: 14709
-
Guys Ask
Topics: 2425 Comments: 17234
-
Couples' Corner
Topics: 2405 Comments: 12737
-
Swingers Lifestyle
Topics: 794 Comments: 5154
-
Fetish & Fantasy
Topics: 1148 Comments: 6957
-
Hot Travel
Topics: 622 Comments: 2145
-
LGBT
Topics: 156 Comments: 1150
Forum help
-
Something related with that
-
Going somewhere & want to hook up?
-
Hasn't that topic been posted before?
RHP's popular dating tool
-
Where the heck did that topic go?
Discover what RHP is doing offline
-
RHP member's RL secrets
reply
like
Share